Module 5
Module 5
• 1. The project manager may easily schedule project activities with the aid of the PERT system. This
method is used more frequently in complex, large-scale project work.
The critical path will be clearly displayed using the PERT approach. The crucial path is the path that
contains tasks that cannot, under any circumstances, be put off. The project manager will be able to
make quick, effective decisions that will improve the performance of the project with the aid of
proper knowledge of the stack values and minimal dependency circumstances.
The PERT networks' activity and events are examined. Both of these are examined separately and
jointly. This will paint a picture of the project's likely completion and the budget
• 4. Coordination of PERT
• The several construction organisation departments will supply the data for the PERT
operations. The departments are well integrated, which will aid in enhancing the project
team's capacity for planning and decision-making. The management of the project's
activities will be improved by combining quantitative and qualitative values from a lot of
data. Additionally, this will enhance communication within the organization's various
departments.
• By appropriately assessing the critical path, it is possible to learn about the potential
outcomes and the various levels of uncertainty from the project activities. What-if
analysis is the term for this kind of analysis. Permutation and combination operations are
carried out for these different sets. The most advantageous mix of them is taken into
account. The set that is selected will have the lowest cost, most economical operation,
and best outcome. The risk connected to any activity can be determined with the use of
this analysis.
• Disadvantages of PERT analysis
• The following list of PERT's drawbacks includes:
1. Time-oriented method
PERT is a time-focused methodology, so completing tasks or projects by the deadline is crucial. If it doesn't, an
issue might develop.
2. Subjective analysis
In this case, the project tasks are identified in accordance with the information at hand. It is challenging in PERT
projects since it applies to the lone new project area that is not recurring in nature, making the information
collection subjective in nature.
3. Inaccuracy in prediction
Since PERT lacks historical data for a project's framework, prediction is necessary. In the
event that the prediction is incorrect, the project could be ruined.
4. Costly process
In terms of the amount of time, study, forecast, and resources used, it is too expensive.
5. Labour intensive
PERT analysis is labor-intensive in nature. Large and complex networks form as a result of
the possibility of a rise in project activities and the emergence of various task
dependencies. This method won't work well for the project if two tasks share resources.
Definition of CPM
• The Critical Path Method, sometimes known as CPM, is a method used for
planning and preparation, organizing, coordination, and control in projects.
It was created in the late 1950s. It is expected that the activity's length is set
and predictable in this case. The earliest & latest start times for each
activity are determined using CPM.
• Advantages of CPM
1. Better communication
Critical route method schedules call for feedback from
important parties at every stage of the project's lifespan. The
timeline becomes more realistic and solid from the outset
when the skills of diverse team members & subcontractors,
such as architects, electricians, and construction managers,
are combined.
• 2. Ease in prioritization
• Prioritization is made simpler since project managers may more
easily define priorities and calculate the float of each work by
identifying the critical path. Slack or float measures how much time
a task may be put off before it affects when it will be finished. The
float of non-critical activities is positive, whereas the float of critical
path tasks is zero. Teams can determine the priority of each work by
calculating its float. The priority increases as the float decreases.
• 3. Improved scheduling accuracy
• The critical path approach is a well-liked and dependable tool for
enhancing project schedule accuracy. The PERT analysis helps
teams in estimating overall project time and is often used alongside
CPM. PERT considers unpredictable events, while CPM concentrates
on predictable activities, resulting in three potential timelines: the
most optimistic, the most pessimistic, and the most realistic. Project
managers can produce the most precise forecasts by combining
PERT and CPM.
• 2. Reduced applicability
• Not all projects can benefit from the critical route approach. For instance,
CPM demands repeatable and predictable timelines. For creative projects
that frequently come together in unforeseen ways, such as product
designing or research work, CPM is not a suitable fit. On the other hand,
repetitive or autonomous tasks are not ideal candidates for CPM. For
instance, dozens of machines may need to be cleaned as part of a weekly
maintenance schedule, but the sequence in which they are serviced is
irrelevant. Since there are no activity constraints and no critical route in
this situation, CPM is not useful.
• 3. Limited attention to high-float activities
• When using the CPM, project managers concentrate on the tasks that are
on the critical path. Even though the critical route does affect the overall
project duration, employing this strategy can make it simpler to disregard
low-priority or floaty activities, which can cause delays. A new building's
electrical system installation, for instance, is not a critical path task
because it may be completed over a long period of time. However, project
managers can still affect the completion schedule if they overlook wiring
work or put it off for too long.