Property talk:P105

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

DescriptionLevel of this item in a taxonomic hierarchy
Representstaxonomic rank (Q427626)
Data typeItem
Domain
According to this template: Taxons - taxon (Q16521)
According to statements in the property:
taxon (Q16521) or fictional taxon (Q15707583)
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed values
According to this template: taxonomic rank (Q427626) – see latest list
According to statements in the property:
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
ExampleSus scrofa (Q58697)species (Q7432)
Mus (Q39275)genus (Q34740)
rhinoceros (Q34718)family (Q35409)
Bilinichnus (Q111144859)ichnogenus (Q112082101)
Robot and gadget jobsDeltaBot does the following jobs: The gadget Wikidata useful lets the user choose among some common values for this property and save in one click.
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P105 (Q27969118)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total3,880,904distinct valuesratio
Main statement3,880,879>99.9% of uses20918568.8
Qualifier20<0.1% of uses
Reference5<0.1% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Value type “taxonomic rank (Q427626): This property should use items as value that contain property “instance of (P31)”. On these, the value for instance of (P31) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value taxonomic rank (Q427626) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P105#Value type Q427626, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Type “taxon (Q16521), fictional taxon (Q15707583): item must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “taxon (Q16521), fictional taxon (Q15707583)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
"exceptions" is incompatible with "mandatory" parameter List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P105#Type Q16521, Q15707583, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Item “taxon name (P225): Items with this property should also have “taxon name (P225)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P105#Item P225, search, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P105#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P105#Scope, SPARQL
This property is being used by:

Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

Statistics of values usage: User:Byrial/Used taxons.

Discussion

[edit]

Is this a duplicate of Property:instance of (P31)? --β16 - (talk) 22:45, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

eo:Ne duplikatas. taxon rank (P105) estas pli ekzakta. Marek Mazurkiewicz (talk) 10:49, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of values

[edit]

Can values be limited to predefined list? Infovarius (talk) 19:44, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of feasible taxonomic ranks according to International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants

[edit]

All valid ranks in descending order, according to International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants §4.2:

Currently, the each one is connected to the next higher rank with property P279 "subclass of". Does property P361 "part of" fit better? The order of the ranks is encoded with <lower rank> "part of P361" <next higher rank>. The discussion, if P361 is the right property for encoding this, is here. FelixReimann (talk) 07:17, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of feasible taxonomic ranks according to International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes

[edit]

All valid ranks in descending order, according to International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes §5b, §5c and §5d:

Again, the hierarchy is encoded with property P361 "part of". See discussion above. FelixReimann (talk) 07:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could somebody fix ST8:USA300 (Q150908)? It uses strain (Q855769) as this property value. To Succu about [1]: exceptions listed on this page are more visible than on constraint report pages as I think.Ivan A. Krestinin (talk) 21:17, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan, sometimes exotic cases are not easily to fix and should not be hidden. I tried a fix. Greetings --Succu (talk) 21:59, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a so exotic case, particularly within species that have a high level of mutability and with very fast reproduction (notably bacteria, virii and fungi, and other unicellular species)...
What we call a strain (Q855769) is just a subset of taxons that was significantly isolated in a given region and a short period of time where it first appeared as proliferating, but sometimes there are several distinct instances coexisting and mutating rapidly when new resistances are developed.
We cannot call them variety (Q767728) or subvariety (Q630771), alias var. or subvar. (like taxonomic ranks that are being developed artificially), but they may be considered as approximately equivalent to forms (Q279749) or subforms (Q13202655), or to a mix of them (e.g. for developping "vaccine cocktails" adapted to the most prevalent forms to be treated).
In frequent cases a strain (Q855769) (such as the ST8:USA300 (Q150908) here for bacteria, or the various flu virii, or AIDS) is paraphyletic as it contains several taxons in some more or less related group (often with multiple distant origins), but now occuring at the same time in similar topes (and that are difficult to isolate precisely, except by some common characteristics against which we attempt to develop some common defences). Verdy p (talk) 06:31, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]