Wikidata:Property proposal/Attraction to

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

attraction to

[edit]

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic

   Done: attraction to (P8824) (Talk and documentation)
DescriptionSexual attraction or arousal arising from an entity.
Representsitem sexual orientation (Q464859)
Data typeItem
Domainitem
Example 1urolagnia (Q457251) → urine (Q40924)
Example 2coprophilia (Q464215) → feces (Q496)
Example 3pubic hair fetishism (Q613747) → pubic hair (Q54795)
Example 4foot fetishism (Q463859) → foot (Q15807)
Planned useI am planning on integrating this property with the Gender, Sex, and Sexual Orientation (GSSO) ontology (https://github.com/Superraptor/GSSO) which will be re-integrated into Wikidata once OBO Foundry approves the GSSO's inclusion (https://github.com/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/issues/1258).
Expected completenessalways incomplete (Q21873886)

Motivation

[edit]

There were no connections between such items as "urophilia", "coprophagia", and "pedophilia" and the objects which those attractions are associated (urine, feces, and children, respectively). I tried to think of what would be appropriate for such connections and could not find anything I thought worked. This was the first idea I thought of, and hopefully it works! Thank you so much for your time! If I made any mistakes, I apologize, this is my first time adding a property.  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Superraptor123 (talk • contribs) at 01:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Discussion

[edit]

This is currently expressed using subclass of (P279) with qualifier of (P642). See triskaidekaphobia (Q13) for example.--GZWDer (talk) 02:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GZWDer: Understood, so the usage of subclass of (P279) of sexual attraction (Q464859) with qualifier of (P642) and then the object of attraction is standard practice as of now? (Edit: Just thinking about this a bit more... This is both (in my opinion) a little cumbersome and not entirely accurate. "subclass of sexual attraction of urine" for urophilia is a little awkward and difficult to express in non-Wikidata ontologies which don't typically allow subclasses on "subclass of" statements unless you duplicate an "is_a" statement (my main development platform is Protege, so this may be a platform specific issue). Of course, I'm not super familiar with the Wikidata platform so it might make more sense in this context than in my use case, so I will definitely cede to the majority opinion here.)  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Superraptor123 (talk • contribs) at 15:48, 24 September 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Hello Superraptor123 Hello Do not forget ~~~~ at the end of your discussions. —Eihel (talk) 02:03, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Eihel: I’m so sorry! Won’t happen again! Thank you so much! Superraptor123 (talk) 04:00, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Support copying properties that other ontologies use to make statements that we currently can't make well is good. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 22:29, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This seems to have similar semantics to interested in (P2650). Perhaps that property's domain should be expanded to include intangible items such as fetishes? –IagoQnsi (talk) 03:23, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@IagoQnsi: That would definitely work for the purposes of my ontology as long as the domain is expanded! I would support that if it's the path of least resistance, so to speak. Superraptor123 (talk) 03:58, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Support maybe this can be a sub-property of interested in (P2650) or could use interested in (P2650) with a qualifier? --Hannes Röst (talk) 19:02, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Property_proposal/Attraction_to&oldid=1307583489"