Wikidata:Property proposal/Medusa NRHP ID
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Medusa NRHP ID
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Place
| Description | numerical identifier for a Maryland structure or building listed in the National Register of Historic Places in the Medusa database |
|---|---|
| Represents | Medusa (Q91762116) |
| Data type | External identifier |
| Domain | geographic location (Q2221906) |
| Allowed values | \d+ |
| Example 1 | Cove Point Light (Q5178935) → 24973 |
| Example 2 | Riley-Bolten House (Q14692364) → 17889 |
| Example 3 | USS Torsk (Q7874823) → 46368 |
| Source | https://mht.maryland.gov/secure/medusa/ |
| External links | Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt]. |
| Planned use | Template:Buildings links (Q25751684) |
| Expected completeness | eventually complete (Q21873974) |
| Formatter URL | https://mht.maryland.gov/secure/medusa/mapintermediate.aspx?PropertyID=$1&selRec=nrhp |
| See also | NRHP reference number (P649), Maryland's National Register Properties ID (P8165) |
Motivation
[edit]This new Wikidata property for authority control for cultural heritage (Q18618628) would help improve our coverage of the history of Maryland (Q5865454). Thierry Caro (talk) 18:20, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]
WikiProject Cultural heritage has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead..
Notified participants of WikiProject United States. Thierry Caro (talk) 18:20, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Comment Is that really usefull, since we have already Maryland's National Register Properties ID (P8165) and they have link to each other? --Fralambert (talk) 18:29, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- I would agree it's not the most needed thing on Earth. But the formatter URL and the IDs themselves are different from the ones of the other property. And the target pages have a different layout, etc. So it's still worth storing this too, in my opinion. Just for the sake of being as exhaustive as we can be. I don't mind adding both properties whenever I can, honestly. Thierry Caro (talk) 21:50, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Support. Useful. Ivanhercaz (Talk) 02:01, 24 May 2020 (UTC)- Support Susanna Giaccai (talk) 16:12, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Thierry Caro, Ivanhercaz, Giaccai:
Done --Fralambert (talk) 22:38, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
