Wikipedia

MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/August 2008

< MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist | archives
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Herbythyme in topic g0ogle.co.uk

Proposed Additions

edit

Rihannanow.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Can we blacklist the fan-made blog site www.rihannanow.com? There appears to be at least one, if not more, editor(s) attempting to pass it off on pretty much every article related to Rihanna as her "official website," which it is not. --InDeBiz1 (talk) 22:28, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think we should blacklist it. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 03:02, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Missed this one - sorry. Care to let us have some links etc so that we can take a look. I don't have the time to search it all out right now. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 12:17, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Defer to Global blacklist --Herby talk thyme 11:28, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

webplatez.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

webplatez.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Spammers
Prior spam reports
Appears combined COI and spamming issue. Ongoing posting of links to multiple subjects that point into same domain. IP has been warned multiple times by multiple other contributors over the past several months. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 14:07, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Two minds here. Persistently irritating link placement for sure however this would mean listing a top level hosting domain rather than actually sub domains. Any other views? Cheers --Herby talk thyme 11:40, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thus far, no legitimate links to that domain, so valid ones could be whitelisted if/when they come up; but then again, with the relatively low frequency that these occur, this may be a better candidate for XLinkBot rather than here ... but, if the specific addresses could be blacklisted, there have been four sites, with two variants each of how they've been linked:
--- Barek (talk • contribs) - 14:27, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Reflecting on this I've decided to list this one in full. It is just possible that there will be a valid sub domain or two & this can be dealt with via whitelisting. In the unlikely even there are a mass of appropriate sites that maybe the global domain should be removed & sub domains blacklisted.   Done thanks --Herby talk thyme 12:13, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

spam.celebrityphotos.tv

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

celebrityphotos.tv: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
60.49.85.124 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)

Wesbite features 2 pages of photo galleries, ELs appeared on the articles for both people featured on website. Expecting further abuse when they add content.

Caomhin (talk) 06:50, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Agreed, of no value to the project.   Done thanks --Herby talk thyme 07:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

opik.superhosting.bg/~aerobati

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It's the aerobatic teams spammer again. See WikiProject Spam report. MER-C 12:28, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done --Herby talk thyme 07:19, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

CCNACERTIFICATIONGUIDE.COM

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

ccnacertificationguide.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Persistent spam on Cisco Career Certifications on various versions of this website link. The link on all small letters were blocked and the spammers continue to add them in this form from different IPs -- Tinu Cherian - 12:00, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Agreed &   Done thanks --Herby talk thyme 08:30, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

disneylandresort-paris.tk

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Note: this was originally posted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#spam.disneylandresort-paris.tk

This is a tricky one. If you follow the link, it appears to work. But, if you have scripts disabled then do a view source on the page, you find that the link uses frames to make the IP look like it remains the one clicked, while it actually calls a referral link at clkuk.tradedoubler.com/click?p(8854)a(1399565)g(214505)

This same user tried changing the "Official site" link to be the tradedoubler link directly once; then tried hiding it with a minu.ws redirect minu.ws/UuW (while using a misleading edit summary), and has most recently tries the above URL with a misleading edit summary here. Looking at history, the same user also tried the same trick with a different link in an unrelated article here.

The user then created a user account, and tried re-inserting the spam link to two different articles (using false edit summaries to try changing the link to the official site) here and here.

Accounts
Link
Other link with same hidden referral trick

-- - Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:32, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've requested minu.ws to be blacklisted globally on meta, meanwhile. -- lucasbfr talk 17:52, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

minu.ws listed on Meta thanks. Here it is the behaviour that makes it blacklistable to me. "Stealing" another url, false edit summaries etc.   Done thanks --Herby talk thyme 08:22, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

prs505.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Please add prs505.com to the blacklist, due to persistent spam on Sony Reader. Warned the user Ram187 (also logged from 189.141.19.179) numerous times about WP:LINKSPAM and using Wikipedia for advertisement of products and web sites. Regardless, the warnings are being erased by the user and spamming goes on. Reezerf (talk) 20:20, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

User
To my interpretation, that article has a lot more external link issues than just that one link. I'm going to purge most of the links now - although others should also review the article. I'm going to purge all links in the EL sections "Content", "Forums", "Third Party/Tools" and "Reviews/Press" as they fail WP:ELNO, WP:NOT#REPOSITORY, and WP:NOT#DIRECTORY. I will add the reviews to the talk page, as they could be useable in ref tags ... but none of the others belong in the article per WP policies and guidelines. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:09, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The attitude towards the community in these postings leaves me with no doubts.   Done thanks --Herby talk thyme 08:11, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

mediatraffic.de / fake, unreliable chart site - In the communities very own words

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Per this community ruling - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United World Chart. The article, chart and website are deemed unreliable. Unfortunately, IPS, newbies and fan boys keep re adding the "source" despite community consensus. The site is still used in over 1000 wikipedia article, its going to be a nightmare training people not to use it so it should be blocked. — Realist2 (Come Speak To Me) 02:47, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Looks listable BUT call me picky there is no way this should be listed until a major amount of the current links are removed. --Herby talk thyme 12:10, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Nothing else heard so   Stale? --Herby talk thyme 11:24, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
New domain (12 August)

Fairly obvious dynamic IP spamming. See WikiProject Spam report. MER-C 10:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bump. MER-C 12:28, 11 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Stale? --Herby talk thyme 07:44, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Nope. MER-C 12:07, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yep, agreed,   Done. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 12:36, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

digitalvaporizer.org

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

digitalvaporizer.org: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Several IP addresses have spammed eternal links on Vaporizer for purely commercial purposes. Furthermore they blacklisted link of manufacturer. Examples of persistent undo's 

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vaporizer&diff=222857457&oldid=222811376
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vaporizer&diff=222677522&oldid=222621629
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vaporizer&diff=222088032&oldid=221859481

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.139.78.32 (talk • contribs) 15:44, 2 Jul 2008

Of possible interest would be this. --Herby talk thyme 15:50, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
This too.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 16:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Stale?

nimp.org

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Any reason why this is not blacklisted already? I'd be bold, but I'm pretty sure I'm not the first one having this idea. :) -- lucasbfr talk 17:26, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's already blacklisted -- has been for a while. --A. B. (talk • contribs) 01:08, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
The blacklist doesn't affect edit/move summaries anyhow. -Jéské (v^_^v Mrrph-mph!) 01:10, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I was sure I read a bugzilla mentioning it was now the case. I guess I either was wrong or the change was reverted. Thanks for the clarification :) -- lucasbfr talk 12:03, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Anarchy.no

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anarchist International, this site is neither of a notable organization, a reliable source or an informative resource on an encyclopedic topic. N00b submission by Skomorokh 07:26, 27 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Link summary

anarchy.no: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Some info on the users/IPs placing the links please. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 18:31, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Probably a single user, User:Anna Quist and her IP socks. See Wikipedia:An#User:Anna_Quist for context. Specific instances of this site being used for blatant promotion and lies include [1] [2] [3]. Hope this suffices, let me know if you need more, Skomorokh 18:41, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Certainly the links should be removed/reverted based on the AfD conclusion. The issue here is a POV one rather than a spamming one though & this method should really only be used as a last resort to deal with that sort of link placement. If the community feel that the links are undesirable then (with a number of users agreeing) then feel free to come back with a link to the discussion & I would list. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 11:29, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

prs-500formatter.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Link

Note: This appears to be an old URL that now points to prs505.com, which was itself recently blacklisted (see above).

Account

Note: This appears to be a WP:SPA whose only six edits to the article have been to add the above commercial links. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:30, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Agreed thanks &   Done. --Herby talk thyme 07:41, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

hkc22

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Several IPs have been promoting an external website across several wikipedia projects jv ie, promoting commercial services. This behaviour extends back as far as 2005 en - china. An internet search for "hkc22 wiki" turns up lots of edits to the en wiki (270 hits), such as those that have been mirrored by other websites dodgy mirror User A1 (talk) 22:50, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Defer to Global blacklist --Herby talk thyme 11:41, 2 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

nipplecharms .com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Link to specific page on the site being added with the description being used: www.nipplecharms.com/non-piercing-body-jewelry.html Healing times for Body Jewelry

This commercial site (masquerading as a "healing times" site) continues to repeatedly be added to the nipple piercing article. Edits to include the link are spread apart by significant time (so protecting the page for a period of time can't help) and by multiple IP addresses (so blocking them can't help). The site's sole purpose is to sell non-piercing body jewelry and gives no useful information that can't be found on more reliable sites. The IPs have even gone so far as to "undo" a vandalism revert of mine to get the link back in the article. --132 22:02, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Agreed &   Done. It is the method of placement that concerns me here together with use of a number of IPs. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 08:19, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

wisdomfinancialinc.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Added to multiple articles using multiple IPs over several days despite numerous warnings. IPs:

Peacock (talk) 18:12, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes. The shifting of ISPs even does not fill me with confidence that any lesson is learnt here.   Done thanks --Herby talk thyme 11:34, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

CCNACERTIFICATIONGUIDE.COM

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

{ccnacertificationguide.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com Link spamming to Cisco Career Certifications from different IPs like this. the small letter URL was blackisted and they continue to add the link in capital letters. Please black list the URL -- Tinu Cherian - 02:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not something the BL can handle now as that are adding text not links. --Herby talk thyme 09:26, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

oojai.com / Fenix Web Works spam

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Spam domain


Related domain


Spam accounts

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 03:18, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 04:20, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Spam and article-tampering by Volano Software Inc.

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Deleted spam pages


Article tampering


Domain registration

Volano Software Inc.

125A-1030 Denman Street
Vancouver, British Columbia V6G 2M6


Spam accounts


Spam domains


See also

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 04:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 04:20, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

hiitsource.com and others

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

A concerted effort over more than a year to get related links (pub-6352184038900190 or registered to the same person) onto Wikipedia. Most recent addition is today [4].

Websites:

Accounts:

Editor is using multiple IPs so requesting blacklisting. -- SiobhanHansa 20:30, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks &   Done. --Herby talk thyme 12:41, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


FYI:
Cross-wiki:


Related domains:


Accounts:
--A. B. (talk • contribs) 14:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Typemock.com spam

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Spam domains


Spam account

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 12:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 15:17, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

northsaintpaulresident.blogspot.com spam, disruption and threats on Wikipedia

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Spam sockpuppets


Spam domain


See also

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 15:08, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Also note that this link has been spammed onto both North St. Paul, Minnesota (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and Maplewood, Minnesota (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). --Elkman (Elkspeak) 15:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 15:20, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Seedbox Hosting spam

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion
Spam domains


Spam accounts


Deleted page

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 18:57, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done--A. B. (talk • contribs) 19:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


More spam today
Redirects to the now-blacklisted myseedbox.com site


Another spam account


Related domains
Notwithstanding their totally unrelated domain names, all but two are redirects to myseedbox.com
--A. B. (talk • contribs) 02:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
  Done: additional domains blacklisted. --A. B. (talk • contribs) 07:58, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Google Adsense ID: 5585439881931722

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Spam domains

Google Adsense ID: 5585439881931722


Spam account

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 19:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done--A. B. (talk • contribs) 19:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


cypher-zone.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Spam domain

Google Adsense ID: 1874958528963200


Spam account

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 01:48, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 02:39, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

ukofficialrecords.co.uk spam

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Spam domains


Related domains


Spam accounts

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 02:30, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 02:42, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


termpaperessayswriting.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Spam domain


Related domains


Spam account

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 15:24, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 01:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

water4gas.com spam

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Spam domain


Related domains


Possibly affiliated domains


Spam accounts

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 19:41, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 01:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Golbro Tiger View Resort spam

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Spam domain


Spam accounts

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 20:50, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 01:53, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

fifthindependent.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Spam domain


Spam/vandal account

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 21:02, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 01:53, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

orissamedical.com spam

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Spam domains


Related domain


Spam accounts

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 01:00, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done (except nephroindia.com) --A. B. (talk • contribs) 01:53, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

blueresume.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Spam domain

Google Adsense ID: 5373924336361027


Related domains


Spam accounts

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 01:25, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 01:54, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Monarchy Brokers spam

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Spammer


Spammer account

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 02:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 17:37, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


relianceinsider.com spam

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Domain spammed
Google Adsense ID: 0761072420661746


Related domains
Google Adsense ID: 2213215412374142
Google Adsense ID: 0761072420661746


Accounts used

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 02:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 17:37, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


american-steamers.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Spam domain


Spam account

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 02:55, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 17:45, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

web-anatomy.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

flvplayer.web-anatomy.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

FLV player spam from an IP at the same ISP; two blocks (and the third one expires today), multiple warnings. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject_Spam#Web-anatomy.

--AVRS (talk) 13:58, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 17:40, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
This turns out to include cross-wiki spamming, so I have relisted this at Meta:   Defer to Global blacklist --A. B. (talk • contribs) 03:57, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

downtownbellevue.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Links
Accounts

Repeated re-addition of commercial link (here, here, here, here, and here) that does not meet criteria of WP:ELNO and WP:NOT#REPOSITORY. It's a community blog and forum site, and appears to be getting added for self-promotion of the site. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:15, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 17:45, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

be-long.com and hosebelt.com spam

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Spam domains


Spam accounts

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 15:53, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 17:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

"weaponologist": article-disruption and eBay store spam

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Spam domain


Related domain


Spam account

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 16:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done
Note that I blacklisted all eBay stores pre-emptively. We get spam from store-owners from time to time and I see no way 99% of these links can ever meet our External Links Guideline. Any legitimate uses can always be handled on a case-by-case basis at MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist. --A. B. (talk • contribs) 17:44, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Shine Music School spam

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Spam accounts


Spam domain

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 22:00, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 03:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

flexyx.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Spam domain


Spam account

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 22:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 03:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

handbagvip.com spam

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Spam articles


Spam domain


Account

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 23:20, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 03:58, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

gaysbr.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Spam domain


Related domain


Spam accounts

Very disruptive spam -- spams large chunks of spam in place of sections of unrelated articles. --A. B. (talk • contribs) 00:21, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 03:58, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

New West Realty (Chicago) spam

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Articles deleted as blatant advertising


Spam domain


Related domains


Accounts

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 03:34, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 03:59, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

sexhealthguru.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Level four warning on 2008-08-17 [18] (and on other accounts). Editor back again today [19] [20] [21]. Admin may also want to consider this exchange today [22] [23] in case I'm just being grumpy. -- SiobhanHansa 12:25, 18 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes agreed &   Done thanks. Sorry it took more than "5 mins" ;) --Herby talk thyme 17:56, 18 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


MyCloud.com.au spam on Wikipedia

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Spam domains


Spam accounts

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 15:22, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


  Done --A. B. (talk • contribs) 15:28, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

rich-media-project.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

rich-media-project.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#Rich Media Project. The link has also been added to the top of an internal links list in fr:Flash Video.

--AVRS (talk) 17:19, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


  Done earlier today. However, it looks like I should have listed this on the meta blacklist since it's been spammed cross-wiki. --A. B. (talk • contribs) 02:57, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

mysmp.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

69.255.236.89 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)

Persistent, long-term spamming on finance pages. Ronnotel (talk) 17:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Thanks, Ronnotel.
Domain
Google Adsense ID: 0719114306637522


Additional accounts


Cross-wiki spam
  Defer to Global blacklist since it's cross-wiki; I'll take care of handling this on Meta.--A. B. (talk • contribs) 03:20, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

g0ogle.co.uk

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Link was posted via a misleading edit summary to Google (disambiguation). It appears to be a referal page, to gain hits / revenue. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:32, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Agreed (& user blocked).   Done --Herby talk thyme 18:49, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

magicurl.net

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

A tinyURL type website that is being used to redirect to the already blacklisted site disneylandresort-paris.tk. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:32, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hum - url shorteners go straight to Meta. As such   Defer to Global blacklist but I've done it there! Thanks --Herby talk thyme 18:43, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed Removals

edit

ogpaper.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

We have been blacklisted for spam, which has not been conducted by any of our staff. Please, look into our case for possible blacklist removal. Thank you. If it helps, we are Google News and MSN News source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.8.24.140 (talk) 22:06, 1 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

This site is not blacklisted on Wikipedia directly, it's instead on the global blacklist used by multiple wikis. To request its removal, you'll need to place the request on the talk page for the global blacklist.
For reference, the reason for it being blacklisted can be found here. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:15, 1 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I have moved the request. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.8.24.140 (talk) 23:00, 1 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

clickok.co.uk/index4.html

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Why clickok.co.uk blacklisted? I want to add it as a link from the Hero's Journey wikipedia pages. This is the best site on the topic I have come across. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.21.43.188 (talk) 08:32, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

That domain is blacklisted on Meta due to cross-wiki spamming. Based on the history of what appeared to be automated or semi-automated spamdalism, I can't support removing it from the blacklist. --Versageek 09:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Closed as   Declined per Versageek --Herby talk thyme 07:17, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

cais-soas.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I'm not at all clear why this is on the blacklist. It describes itself accurately: "The Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies (CAIS) is an independent not-for-profit educational programme, with no affiliation to any political or religious group dedicated to the research, protection, preservation of the pre-Islamic Iranian civilisation.

CAIS was established in 1998 by Shapour Suren-Pahlav and Oric Basirov (Department of Art and Archaeology), under the name of "Ancient Iranian Civilisation at the School of Oriental and African Studies" (AIC at SOAS) and later changed to "The Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies at the School of Oriental and African Studies" (CAIS at SOAS) of the University of London, to act as a forum for the exchange of information about the art, archaeology, culture and civilisation of Iranian peoples. CAIS no longer has any affiliation with SOAS."

It's a reliable source so far as I can see (and much better than a lot of sources) yet it can't be used. Doug Weller (talk) 09:27, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hmm, I recall this item .. was discussed not too long ago. Ah, here: m:Talk:Spam_blacklist#cais-soas.com, blacklisted for this reason. There is quite some history with this link, and apparently they routinely violate copyright. I tend to   Declined, and to ask you to either find other sources, and/or whitelist thoroughly checked specific link. --Dirk Beetstra T C 11:56, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Those are good reasons, I agree with them. I remember when it was a part of the SOAS, it's a shame what has happened to it. Doug Weller (talk) 18:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

readwriteweb.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This is one of the top tech blog and news services in the entire United States, and is a Google News source. It has a strong reputation in the tech field, and is an informational site, not a commercial one. I want to use it for a source. VanTucky 22:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The listing hinges around this, this and this. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 11:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Nothing further heard. Closed as   Not done --Herby talk thyme 07:45, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

freencaa09rosters.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

This is a site created by the EA Sports NCAA Football community to help combat roster thieves like Brian Kaldenberg that steal the legitimate rosters of others and sells them for profit. It's simply a directory of EA Locker accounts and the web sites to the actual roster makers. By allowing the general public to be victim to Kaldenberg's scam, it jeopardizes the ability of roster editing altogether in the NCAA Football series. Ghettoshark (talk) 15:56, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

There were so many problems with spamming of simlar sounding domain names that another administrator, Hu12, wrote a regex entry into our blacklist to block links to any domain that sounded like one of Kaldenberg's domains. That's what has snared your domain:
ncaa2009rosters
Here's Hu12's entry for this blacklisting:
Given the complexity and history of all this, I'd like to have Hu12 handle any blacklist removal. Unfortunately, he's away for a while due to deaths in his family, so it may be a little while. Please be patient in the meantime. --A. B. (talk • contribs) 16:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for looking into this. Kaldenberg is, shall I say a [redacted], who we (the NCAA community) has had the displeasure of dealing with through his spamming of links onto numerous forums and stealing our files. So he has been spamming here as well? Although I wouldn't put it past him... Ghettoshark (talk) 20:07, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Note: I redacted this edit[24] to remove an offensive characterization of an individual. --A. B. (talk • contribs) 21:02, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Closed as   Not done --Herby talk thyme 07:46, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

errorforum.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Errorforum is added to blacklist since i added it to the section called error .I think its relevant over there because thats the place where people will get the fix to the most common technical error. Would request to remove it from blacklist and restore the link in error category. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Share2die (talk • contribs) 15:17, 14 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Links to forums would not normally be required and there has been excessive link placement - see here. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 07:47, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Nothing further heard. Closed as   Not done --Herby talk thyme 07:47, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Microfinance Gateway

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The Microfinance Gateway website (microfinancegateway.org) is on the spam balcklist. This is a very valuable resource about microfinance that describes itself as: "The Microfinance Gateway is the most comprehensive online resource for the global microfinance community. It includes research and publications, featured articles, organization and consultant profiles, and the latest news, events, and job opportunities in microfinance."

It has a lot of valuable resources about microfinance -- many of which are not available elsewhere -- and I really do not see why it should be blacklisted. Thank you. Mikel1777 (talk) 16:54, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

It has been reported to WT:WPSPAM, with some spamming evidence. Some accounts suggest conflict of interest problems. --Dirk Beetstra T C 17:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Closed as   Declined --Herby talk thyme 07:48, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Efl-Law.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Does anyone know why this site is blacklisted? I was going to list it on the Teaching English as Foreign Language page, when I recieved a blacklist message. The site contains a lot of good information for teachers in Korea re: Korean contracts and labour laws that is hard to find anywhere else, and I feel it would be a good general legal resource for English teachers overseas. Yodaki2 (talk) 07:15, 20 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

This link was blacklisted on our global blacklist on Meta, not our English-only blacklist. Meta-Wiki (or just "Meta") is a separate project/website for coordinating activities (including spam mitigation) across all 700+ Wikimedia projects.
I did some research on this domain's history. As far as I can tell, it was only spammed once[25] and the anonymous IP, 221.161.160.201, that spammed the link received no warnings. An editor (not an admin here), Amgine, removed the link[26] and then blacklisted it on the meta blacklist[27] (he was an admin on meta). Unfortunately, Amgine left no comment in the Spam blacklist talk page archives and there is no blacklist log entry. Amgine is also no longer active here or on Meta.
Amgine also blacklisted a similarly named site, efl-law.org,[28] a few weeks later; that site is totally unrelated and is just a scraper site as far as I can tell.
Here are related domains that I could find:
I found that some of these domains had been heavily spammed recently, especially by these accounts:
This included creating a couple of spam articles:
I would have liked to have seen more warning given before this domain was originally blacklisted. On the other hand, I am worried that this domain will be abused by the site-owner if this link is removed from Meta's blacklist. Is there a specific page on that site that you have to cite as a reference?
--A. B. (talk • contribs) 19:10, 20 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I can set up a whole tree of data for the later list of domains (A handful of IPs adding asian-efl-journal.com; 121.144.99.67 (14), 210.105.172.195 (9), 118.38.181.109 (1), 118.109.82.142 (1), 221.170.61.228 (1), 220.84.99.43 (1), 118.109.46.241 (1)), but I don't have any data for the first ones (efl-law.com, efl-law.org). Yodaki2, can you request whitelisting of certain documents on the elf-law.com? --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:48, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Closed as   Declined though more to archive as it is a Meta matter. --Herby talk thyme 11:36, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

youporn.com

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This site is apparently blocked, but for what reason? There are plenty of pornographic-hyperlinks on this site that remain perfectly linkable, why should the most popular one be blacklisted? It is a prominent site and desserved to be unblocked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Annihilan (talk • contribs) 04:46, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

The fact that "others exist" is no argument for removal. If there was community consensus over established users then it would be likely to happen but I have some doubts. --Herby talk thyme 11:38, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
  Declined, per Herby. --Dirk Beetstra T C 12:07, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Outrate.net

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Cannot add really great interviews for relevant wiki pages as this site appears to have been blacklisted and I have no idea why. The pages are outrate (dot) net/buckangel.html and outrate (dot) net/camillepaglia.html - fantastic interviews referenced around the net but not on the relevant Buck Angel and Camille Paglia wikipedia pages. I'm a researcher in gneder studies at UC Berkeley and I rally feel that these are great additions to these wiki pages but cannot add them too external links as the site keeps reporting as being "blacklisted".

Please help? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 55starman55 (talk • contribs) 16:03, 27 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Doesn't appear to be blacklisted? --Herby talk thyme 07:49, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


Trying to add the interview and I receive the following message:

The spam filter blocked your page save because it detected a blacklisted hyperlink. If you did not add the link yourself, it most likely was added by another editor before being blacklisted. You will need to remove all instances of the blacklisted link before you can save your edit. If you are attempting a section edit, note that this block may even be due to blacklisted links in other sections. If you need help removing the blacklisted link, post a message at Wikipedia:Help desk.

The site is outrate.net —Preceding unsigned comment added by 55starman55 (talk • contribs) 16:15, July 29, 2008

It appears that this is blacklisted on the global blacklist that is used by multiple wikis, it's not Wikipedia specific. To propose it's removal from the global blacklist, you'll need to submit the request to the talk page for it on the Global blacklist talk page over on Wikimedia.org.
For background, the reason they show for it being blacklisted originally is here. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:33, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Closed as a Meta matter. --Herby talk thyme 11:37, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Troubleshooting and problems

edit

Discussion

edit
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/August_2008&oldid=1109319693"