Talk:2014 FIFA World Cup final

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Amakuru in topic Distance from airport to ground - OR?
Featured article2014 FIFA World Cup final is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 18, 2022.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 26, 2021Good article nomineeListed
October 26, 2021Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Streaking incident

edit

Vitaliy Zdorovetskiy pitch invasion - do you think that it's notable enough to be included in the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.100.1.66 (talk) 07:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

No. It's not been picked up by any mainstream media, as far as I can tell. It's just a streaker on the pitch, it's not really huge news. - 97rob (talk) 13:56, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for getting back to me! Good point, I agree with you! I guess it could also become notable if a statement made by Benedikt Howedes regarding his interaction with the streaker received significant coverage. In any case, the Vitaly Zdorovetskiy article mentions the incident.

Guess what it's on the article. Owned.2602:306:CC4B:BA69:41F9:7D54:F6BA:C288 (talk) 00:40, 22 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2014 FIFA World Cup Final. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:44, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2014 FIFA World Cup Final. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:16, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA

edit

Can it be a GAN? Nhatminh01 (talk) 13:46, 14 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:2014 FIFA World Cup Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 17:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply


Comments

That's the lead done. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:34, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

That's me at the "Route to the final" section. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:43, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

@The Rambling Man: all looked at so far, done or commented upon, I believe.  — Amakuru (talk) 20:03, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

more

That's all I have for now. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 11:11, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

@The Rambling Man: - I think I've looked at all your points, with just one query above. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 14:53, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Well overlinking is not a GA criterion so I'm duty-bound to overlook that! So I'm passing now. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 14:57, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1930 FIFA World Cup Final which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Distance from airport to ground - OR?

edit

@Piledhigheranddeeper: Regarding your inline query about OR, I think this would fall under WP:CALC. The location of the stadium and the location of the airport are as cited, and distance between two locations on the surface of Earth would qualify as a routine calculation. I used Google Maps distance calculator as a convenience, but could have also used a standard formula to reach the same result. Note that this passed FAC, and a similar case at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2017 Africa Cup of Nations Final/archive1#Source review was verified explicitly by a source reviewer who said to explicitly state where the weather forecast was located. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 17:05, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply