Talk:Clothing

kiyoshi's type of clothes

i just love those kind of clothes,it like my kind of type of clothes.well nothing to say so sorry. buh-bye.

International Cleaning Codes

Why does this article not include a definition for each of the icons listed in cleaning instructions? I have a foreign item, do not understand the text, and am trying to figure out what each icon means. I thought maybe wiki would help, but you haven't even included a link to relevant info... :(

clothes and status

Currently: "In other societies (including most modern societies), no laws prohibit lower-status people wearing high status garments, but the high cost of status garments effectively limits purchase and display. In current Western society, only the rich can afford haute couture. " Leaving aside haute couture, which is worn by very, very few people (and quickly knocked off, so it's hard for most people to tell the difference), this statement is rather a distortion of the contemporary American situation, wherein a decent business suit and accessories costs far less than the designer warmups and high-end sneakers (not to mention bling) affected by many socioeconomically "deprived" persons.

Expanding the scope of the introduction

I've been working on the introduction. I think it is more clearly written now, but it only focuses on the function and definition of clothing and doesn't summarize any of the latter issues of the article. Also, the details about accessories, etc. may be a bit out of place in the introduction, which typically gives an overview rather than worry about minutae. So, two issues: a)Expand the scope of the introduction; and b)Consider creating a new section which addresses the definition (what is vs. what is not clothing)...Or does the way it is seem to work well enough as it is?

References for prehistoric clothing

Just a stash:

Cloth Cultures in Prehistoric Europe: the Bronze Age evidence from Hallstatt

The Prehistoric Development of Clothing: Archaeological Implications of a Thermal Model

http://www.ancientcraft.co.uk/reenactment/prehistoric_clothes.html

Lousy

Lice Reveal Clues to Human Evolution [[1]] "Reed and colleagues have also looked at the split between head and clothing lice for clues as to when humans began wearing clothes. They found that clothing lice diverged from head lice between 80,000 and 170,000 years ago, most likely at the earlier end of that range." Kortoso (talk)

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Community Economic and Social Development II

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 January 2024 and 12 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ansmehta (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Samandeepkaur002, Arjunverma 28, Arshdeepkaur015, Mabhullar, Randeepsingh002, Sandeep kaur028.

— Assignment last updated by Arshdeepkaur015 (talk) 05:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Historical background

How about a historical section of prior teachings on the topic of clothing and health, by advocates of 'loose and comfortable clothing' (of which there have been several, some in the 'natural health' communities? Surely a history of teaching about 'what is appropriate clothing' is not out of order.

Historical Perspectives on Clothing Ethics

• Throughout history, various advocates, particularly within the natural health communities, have promoted the concept of loose and comfortable clothing as a fundamental aspect of clothing ethics. These historical teachings offer valuable insights into societal attitudes towards clothing and notions of what constitutes appropriate attire.

Ancient Traditions:

• Ancient Greece and Rome: Philosophers such as Plato and Seneca emphasized the importance of simplicity and moderation in attire, advocating for clothing that allowed freedom of movement and comfort.
• Eastern Philosophies: Traditional Eastern philosophies, including Buddhism and Taoism, often encouraged the use of loose-fitting garments to promote physical ease and mental tranquility.

Medieval and Renaissance Period:

• Medieval Europe: During the Middle Ages, certain religious orders, like the Franciscans, adopted plain and unadorned clothing as a symbol of humility and detachment from worldly possessions.
• Renaissance Humanism: Humanist thinkers like Erasmus of Rotterdam critiqued the ostentatious clothing of the nobility, promoting modest attire as a reflection of inner virtue.

19th and 20th Centuries:

• Victorian Era: Social reformers, including dress reform advocates like Amelia Bloomer, campaigned for practical and comfortable clothing for women, challenging restrictive and impractical fashion norms.
• Early 20th Century: Figures like Mahatma Gandhi promoted the use of simple, homespun garments as a means of self-sufficiency and resistance to colonial oppression.

Modern Movements:

• Natural Health Communities: Throughout the 20th and 21st centuries, proponents of natural health and holistic well-being have emphasized the importance of clothing that allows for unrestricted movement and promotes bodily comfort.

Exploring these historical teachings provides valuable context for understanding contemporary perspectives on clothing ethics and sheds light on evolving societal attitudes towards clothing and personal adornment.MaynardClark (talk) 05:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SU24 - Sect 200 - Thu

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 May 2024 and 24 August 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Zhilin0321 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Zq2197 (talk) 04:29, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Clothing as Communication and Identity

Adding how clothing can be communication and identities with communication theories to back it up. It adds to clothing as there is already a "Clothing as comfort" section - therefore this is involved as an aspect of clothing as well! That it is a communicative form.

The links for journals in parentheses will be marked as citations.

---

Clothing functions as a form of nonverbal communication through its semiotic properties, acting as a visible representation of identity. It is a practice that can be easily adapted or modified to suit various contexts (doi:10.1177/0887302X9201100103. ISSN 0887-302X). As a nonverbal cue, clothing facilitates the connection between the wearer and the observer by conveying implicit messages. These messages are often shaped by elements such as color, design, logos, and fabric. Clothing can signify group affiliation, enable self-categorization, and serve as an indicator of social status, often communicating conformity or differentiation.

Communication Theories

Clothing is involved in the construction of both personal and social identities (doi:10.21547/jss.411181. ISSN 1303-0094). Two theories related to clothing as a form of communication are Social Identity Theory and the Communication Theory of Identity (CTI) (doi:10.1080/01463370409370197. ISSN 0146-3373). Social Identity Theory posits that individuals seek to associate with particular groups by adopting shared values and affiliations (https://www.simplypsychology.org/social-identity-theory.html). Clothing functions as a marker of group membership, reflecting the values and norms of the group with which an individual identifies. The Communication Theory of Identity (CTI) suggests that identity is constructed and communicated through social interactions, with four key layers: personal, enacted, relational, and communal (doi:10.1080/01463370409370197. ISSN 0146-3373).

• Personal Identity: This refers to how individuals define themselves in terms of their values and beliefs. Clothing acts as a tool for self-expression, allowing individuals to communicate their personal identity.
• Enacted Identity: This involves how individuals express their identity through outward behaviors, including clothing choices.
• Relational Identity: Relational identity is shaped by social relationships and interactions. Clothing choices may shift depending on the social context and how individuals wish to be perceived in relation to others.
• Communal Identity: Communal identity is formed through group membership and adherence to cultural norms. Clothing often reflects communal expectations, with individuals using attire to either conform to or differentiate from group standards.

Intercultural Considerations

Traditional garments, such as the Japanese kimono or the Scottish kilt, represent specific cultural identities, serving as symbols of the sociocultural context of the wearer (doi:10.5281/zenodo.8117714). Cultural norms significantly influence clothing choices, guiding both the wearer’s decisions and the messages conveyed to observers (doi:10.1108/13612021311305128. ISSN 1361-2026). Jessicaraymond97 (talk) 22:43, 18 October 2024 (UTC)