Tambralinga (Sanskrit: Tāmbraliṅga) was an Indianised kingdom located on the Malay Peninsula (in modern-day Southern Thailand), existing at least from the 2nd to 13th centuries CE.[1][2]: 19 It possibly was under the influence of Srivijaya for some time,[a] but later became independent from it or were generally allies rather than conqueror and vassal.[2]: 23 The name had been forgotten until scholars recognized Tambralinga as Nakhon Si Thammarat (Nagara Sri Dharmaraja). In Sanskrit and Prakrit, tām(b)ra means "copper", "copper-coloured" or "red" and linga means "symbol" or "creation", typically representing the divine energy of Shiva.[4][5]
Tambralinga Tāmbraliṅga | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
c. 2nd century CE–1277 | |||||||||||
Capital | Nakhon Si Thammarat (on the Malay Peninsula) | ||||||||||
Common languages | Old Malay, Mon, Sanskrit, Old Khmer | ||||||||||
Religion | Hinduism, Buddhism | ||||||||||
Government | Monarchy | ||||||||||
King | |||||||||||
• 1230–1262 | Chandrabhanu | ||||||||||
• 1263–1277 | Savakanmaindan | ||||||||||
History | |||||||||||
c. 2nd century CE | |||||||||||
927 | |||||||||||
• First mentioned in medieval Chinese sources | 970 | ||||||||||
775–969 | |||||||||||
• Late Independent | 970–1277 | ||||||||||
1003 | |||||||||||
1025 | |||||||||||
• Tambralinga invaded Sri Lanka | 1247 | ||||||||||
• Fall of Tambralinga | 1277 | ||||||||||
• Refounded and became Nakhon Si Thammarat Kingdom | 1278 | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Today part of | Thailand, Malaysia |
Tambralinga first sent an embassy to China under the Song dynasty in 1001. In the 12th century it may or may not have been under the suzerainty of the Burmese Pagan Kingdom and a kingdom of Sri Lanka.[6] At its height in the mid-13th century, under King Chandrabhanu, Tambralinga was independent, regrouping and consolidating its power and even invading Sri Lanka.[7] By the end of the 13th century, Tambralinga was recorded in Siamese history as Nakhon Si Thammarat, under the suzerainty of the Tai Sukhothai Kingdom.[8]
History
editEarly coastal polities: 5th century BCE – 5th century CE
editPresent-peninsular Thailand has long been considered an important area in social interaction as the gateway between the South China Sea and the India Ocean since the protohistoric period (c. 500 BCE–500 CE).[2]: 1 Hermann Kulke (1990) suggests that complex pre-Indianized political entities in present-day peninsular Thailand existed before the first millennium CE and developed to the centralized polities around the mid-first millennium CE through the Indianization,[2]: 7, 71 by adopting Indic ideologies to extent the power as well as institutionalizing god-king statuses and dynamic traditions.[9]: 238–240 Tambralinga was one of the significant centralized polities in the area that was mentioned in the India literature in the 2nd century CE.[10]: 183 Previous scholars assume that Tambralingawas situated near modern Nakhon Si Thammarat or Ligor, based on text given in the inscription No. 28 found in Phra Maha That temple at the center of modern Nakhon Si Thammarat, engraved with Pallava scripts in Sanskrit language dated to the 5th century CE.[2]: 19
However, based on Chinese chronicles and ignored local inscriptions, some academics are inclined to believe that the beginning of Tambralinga as an autonomous polity dates to the 10th or 11th century instead, and before that date, it was overshadowed by the northern neighbor Pan Pan centered at the area around the Bay of Bandon in present-day Thailand's Surat Thani province.[2]: 20
Early mandalas: 5th – 10th centuries CE
editThe Chinese Songhuiyaogao chronicle mentions a country named Danliumei (Tan-liu-mei), stating many details during the period from 970 to 1070. It gives the impression that the kingdom was an independent state at that time, sending embassies to the court of China under the Song dynasty in 1001, 1016 and 1070. Danliumei is assumed to be a Chinese rendering of Tambralinga, the location of that state however is not precisely described. The chronicle of Ma Duanlin and the Songshi, mention similarly named states, Zhoumeiliu (Chou-mei-liu) and Danmeiliu (Tan-liu-mei) respectively, that are also reported to have sent their first mission to China in 1001, which makes it likely that they refer to the same state.[11]
In this era, Tambralinga consisted of five main mandalas located on the bank of Khlong Tha Khwai, Khlong Tha Chieo – Tha Thon, Khlong Tha Lat, Maying River, and the largest one on the Haad Sai Keao dune, which was speculated to be the center of Tambralinga.[2]: 125 Each of these mandalas formed by several communities in the surrounding area with the shrine of the most sacred site be the center and were connected with other mandalas by waterways and land paths.[2]: 124 Vaishnavism was the prominent belief system unlike Dvaravati in central Thailand and Korat plateau where Hinayana Buddhism was dominant.[2]: 97–98 The kings of Tambralinga were institutionalized as Siva-king but the king's power was probably shared by administrative subordinates and his kinship groups.[2]: 131
Golden age: 10th – mid 13th centuries CE
editDuring the 10th–11th centuries, after gaining independence from Srivijaya by the liberation of King Sujita,[12]: 295 Tambralinga was very strong politically and economically since it sent several missions to the Chinese court and even supported the troops to conquer the Lavo Kingdom[3] as well as seizing the throne of the Angkor, two of the great mandalas in that period.[2]: 23
In his 13th-century work Zhu Fan Zhi, Chinese historian Zhao Rugua mentions the state Danmaling (Tan-ma-ling, 單馬令), describing it as a vassal of Srivijaya.[a] Whether Danmaling can be identified with Tambralinga is dubious;[13] sinologist Roderich Ptak proposes instead to locate it in the Tembeling region of Pahang.[14] In contrast, the Sung shih gives an account of Tambralinga under the name of Tan-mei-liu, and says Tambralinga seems to have been a dependency of the Khmer Empire during all the reigns of Jayavarman VII (r.1181–1218).[12]: 291
An indigenous source of Tambralinga history is an inscription dating to 1183, written in Old Khmer, engraved on the base of a bronze Buddha statue found at Wat Hua Wiang in Chaiya District, Surat Thani Province. It gives an impression of the political situation of Tambralinga in the late-twelfth century.[15] Another important source is a Sanskrit inscription ascribed to King Chandrabhanu of Tambralinga, dated 1230. It gives the king the epithet "Śrī Dharmarāja", which is an evidence for the identification of Tambralinga with Nakhon Si Thammarat (Nagara Śrī Dharmarāja in Sanskrit).[16][17]
In 1244, king Chandrabhanu invaded Sri Lanka, adopting the regnal name 'Srīdḥarmarāja' and installing himself as the king of Jaffna.
The relationships between Tambralinga and the Tai leaders in the north of the Kra Isthmus was speculated to have begun during the reign of Chandrabhanu,[12]: 292 which was expected to be one of the reasons that Srivijaya lost influence over Tambralinga.[12]: 298
Decline: late 13th century
editIn 1365 Majapahit Kingdom of Java recognized Nakorn Sri Dharmaraja as Dharmanagari written in Nagarakretagama. Despite its rapid rise to prominence in the 13th century, that is, by the following century Danmaling, or Tambralinga, the former member state of Sanfoshih – Javaka, had become a part of Siam.
Warfares
edit925–927 Tambralinga–Lavo–Haripuñjaya wars
editIn the early 10th century, battles between two Mon's mandalas, Lavo Kingdom and Haripuñjaya, happened several times.[18] According to the O Smach Inscription, after two years of the enthronement, King Rathasatkara or Trapaka (Thai: อัตราสตกะราช/ตราพกะ) of Haripuñjaya moved south to attack the Lavo Kingdom. Lavo king, King Uchitthaka Chakkawat or Ucchitta Emperor (อุฉิฎฐกะจักรวรรดิ/อุจฉิตตจักรพรรดิ), then moved northward to defend. However, the war between these two sister states spread to the southern kingdom of Siridhammana (Tambralinga), the king of Siridhammana, Jivaka or Suchitra (พระเจ้าชีวก/พระเจ้าสุชิตราช), took the advantage to occupy Lavo.[3] Due to losing Lavo, both Mon's kings rallied up north to occupy Haripuñjaya, but King Rathasatkara eventually lost the city to Lavo's king. After failing to retake Haripuñjaya, King Rathasatkara moved south to settle in Phraek Si Racha (present-day in Sankhaburi district).[18] The battle was also mentioned in several chronicles such as the Jinakalamali and Cāmadevivaṃsa.[3]
After Jivaka took Lavo's capital, Lavapür (ลวปุระ), he appointed his son, Kampoch or Kambojaraja (กัมโพช), as a new ruler and enthroned the ex-Lavo queen as his consort. No evidence mentions that he either resided in Lavo or went back to rule Siridhammana. Three years later, King Kampoch attacked Haripuñjaya but lost.[19] He then attempted to seize another northern city, Nakaburi (นาคบุรี), but also failed. Several battles between Haripuñjaya and Lavo happened since then. Kampoch was married to a Khmer princess who had fled an Angkorian dynastic bloodbath.[19]
Later in 960, Lavapür was annexed by Siamese from Ayodhya,[20] who also shared a political relation with Tambralinga kingdom.[21] Kampoch possibly fled to the Ankor, then back to sack Lavapür in 1002, and eventually merged Lavo into the Ankorian Empire in 1022 after claiming the Angkor and enthroned as Suryavarman I.[3]
1002–1010 Tambralinga–Ankorian–Lavo Wars
editCœdès suggests that Sujita, who was the prince of Tambralinga, won over Udayadityavarman I of the Angkor in 1003 and enthroned as Jayavirahvarman.[2]: 23 This led to a nine-year Angkorian civil war in which Suryavarman I of Lavo won the battle and became the successor of Jayavirahvarman in 1010.[2]: 23 However, Achille Dauphin-Meunier proposes that Jayavirahvarman was the rightful successor and brother of Udayadityavarman I.[22]
Suryavarman I was believed to be Kambojaraja, a son of Sujita and an Angkorian princess.[2]: 22 He was appointed the new ruler of Lavo Kingdom after it was taken over by his father in the 925–927 Tambralinga–Lavo–Haripuñjaya wars.[2]: 22 [3] Some academics cite Suryavarman I was instead a Khmer opponent who evicted Jayavirahvarman out of the Angkor.[2]: 23
1025–1068 Tambralinga/Srivijiya–Ankorian/Chola Wars
editThis section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (April 2024) |
1247–1270 Tambralinga–Sri Lanka Wars
editAccording to the inscription No. 24 found at Hua-wieng temple in Chaiya near Nakhon Si Thammarat, the ruler of Tambralinga named Chandrabhanu Sridhamaraja was the king of Padmavamsa (Lotus dynasty).[23]: 184 He began to reign in 1230, he had the Phra Borommathat (chedi in Nakhon Si Thammarat, from Sanskrit dhatu - element, component, or relic + garbha - storehouse or repository) reparation and celebration in the same year. Chandrabhanu Sridhamaraja brought Tambralinga to the pinnacle of its power in the mid-13th century. From the Sri Lankan and Tamil materials, records, and sources, Chandrabhanu was a Savakan king from Tambralinga who had invaded Sri Lanka in 1247. His navy launched an assault on the southern part of the island but was defeated by the Sri Lankan king.
However Chandrabhanu was able to establish an independent regime in the north of the island over the Jaffna kingdom, but in 1258 he was attacked and subjugated by the Tamil Emperor Jatavarman Sundara Pandyan.[23]: 185 He was compelled to pay a tribute to the Pandyan dynasty of precious jewels and elephants. In 1262 Chandrabhanu launched another attack on the south of the island, his army strengthened this time by the addition of Tamil and Sinhalese forces, only to be defeated when Pandya sided with the Sri Lankan side; this time Jatarvarman Sundara Pandyan's brother Jatavarman Veera Pandyan intervened and Chandrabhanu himself was killed in the fighting. Chandrabhanu's son Savakanmaindan inherited the throne and submitted to Veera Pandyan's rule, received rewards and retained control over the northern kingdom. His regime too had disappeared following Maravarman Kulasekara Pandyan I's ascension to the Pandyan empire's throne and another invasion of the island by the army of the Pandyan dynasty in the late 1270s. Maravarman Kulasekara Pandyan I installed his minister in charge of the invasion, Kulasekara Cinkaiariyan, an Aryachakravarti as the new king of Jaffna.
In at least two senses, the rapid expansion of Tambralinga is exceptional in the history of Southeast Asia. In the first place, Candrabhanu's invasion of Sri Lanka and occupation of the Jaffna kingdom marks the only time that a Southeast Asian power has launched an overseas military expedition beyond the immediate Southeast Asian region. In the second place, in the historiography of Southeast Asia, southern Thailand has generally played a secondary role to that of places like Java, Sumatra, the Malacca Strait region (Srivijaya in the seventh~eighth century, Melaka in the 15th century), Cambodia, Champa, Vietnam, and Burma. Tambralinga's sudden appearance on centre-stage in the 13th century was thus highly unusual.[citation needed]
List of rulers
editRulers | Reign | Note | |
---|---|---|---|
Romanized name | Thai name | ||
Rulers before the reign of Sujita are still unknown. | |||
Sujita[2]: 22 | 970?–1003 |
| |
Rulers before the reign of Sri Thammasokaraj are still unknown. | |||
Sri Thammasokaraj | ศรีธรรมาโศกราช | 1191–1230 | |
Chandrabhanu | จันทรภาณุ | 1230–1262 | |
Savakanmaindan | พงษาสุระ | 1263–1277 | The last ruler of the Padmavamsa clan (ปัทมวงศ์) of Tambralinga |
Heritage and restoration
editThe city chronicle mentions a fortification when the town was refounded in 1278. The Ram Khamhaeng inscription of 1283 lists Nakhon Si Thammarat as one of the tributary kingdoms of Sukhothai. In the Old Javanese Desawarnana document of 1365, the Majapahit kingdom also recognised Nakhon Si Thammarat as belonging to Siam.[24] In the Palatinate Law of King Trailok dated 1468, Nakhon Si Thammarat was listed as one of eight great cities (Phraya maha nakhon) belonging to the Ayutthaya Kingdom. During the reign of King Naresuan (r. 1590–1605) it became a first class province (Mueang Ek).
Restorations were recorded at the time of King Ramesuan (1388–1395), as well as King Narai (1656–1688) of Ayutthaya. The latter one was supported by the French engineer M. de la Mare.
The walls of the town spread 456 meters from east to west, and 2,238 meters north to south, thus enclosing an area of about one square kilometre. The northern wall had only one gate, called Pratu Chai Nuea or Pratu Chai Sak, while the southern wall also had only one gate. To the east there were three gates, which connected the town with the sea. To the west were five gates. Today only the northern gate still exists, together with a short stretch of the northern city wall.
See also
editNotes
edit- ^ a b c Due to the absence of conclusive evidence of long-term Srivijaya's control of Tambralinga, O. W. Wolters suggests that Tambralinga is largely an independent policy, which had close relationships to the Angkor. Leonard Andaya additionally proposes that the previous perception of Srivijaya as the dominant maritime Southeast Asian empire should be refined.[2]: 22–23
References
edit- ^ a b สืบพงศ์ ธรรมชาติ (2014). "อารยธรรมแดนใต้ ตามพรลิงค์ ลังกาสุกะ ศรีวิชัย และศรีธรรมราชมหานคร (เมืองสิบสองนักษัตร)" [The Civilization of Tambralinga Langasuga Sivichai and Si Thammarat Mahanakhon (Muang Sibsongnagasat)]. Asian Journal of Arts and Culture (in Thai). 14 (1). Archived from the original on 24 April 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x Wannasarn Noonsuk (2005). "The Significance of Peninsular Siam in the Southeast Asia Maritime World during 500 BC to AD 1000". University of Hawaiʻi. Archived from the original on 24 April 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f "๑ สหัสวรรษ แห่ง "พระนิยม"". Fine Arts Department (in Thai). Archived from the original on 25 October 2023. Retrieved 26 October 2023.
- ^ Roland Braddell (1980). A Study of Ancient Times in the Malay Peninsula and the Straits of Malaccam and Notes on Ancient Times in Malaya. Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society. p. 398.
- ^ Stuart Munro-Hay (2001). Nakhon Sri Thammarat: The Archaeology, History and Legend of a Southern Thai Town. White Lotus Press. p. 22.
- ^ Michel Jacq-Hergoualc'h (2002). The Malay Peninsula: Crossroads of the Maritime Silk-Road (100 BCE–1300 CE). Brill. p. 400.
- ^ Craig J. Reynolds (2019). Power, Protection and Magic in Thailand: The Cosmos of a Southern Policeman. ANU Press. pp. 74–75.
- ^ Michel Jacq-Hergoualc'h (2002). The Malay Peninsula: Crossroads of the Maritime Silk-Road (100 BCE–1300 CE). Brill. p. 489.
- ^ Paul Wheatley (1975). "Satyanrta in Suvarnadvipa: from Reciprocity to Redistribution in Ancient Southeast Asia". In J. A. Sabloff; C. C. Lamberg-Karlovsky (eds.). Ancient Civilization and Trade. University of New Mexico Press. ISBN 1934691984.
- ^ Paul Wheatley (1966). "The Golden Khersonese" (PDF). University of Malaya Press. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 July 2020.
- ^ Michel Jacq-Hergoualc'h (2002). The Malay Peninsula: Crossroads of the Maritime Silk-Road (100 BCE–1300 CE). Brill. pp. 351–352.
- ^ a b c d Lawrence Palmer Briggs (1950). "The Khmer Empire and the Malay Peninsula". The Far Eastern Quarterly. 9 (3). Duke University Press: 256–305. doi:10.2307/2049556. JSTOR 2049556. Archived from the original on 26 April 2024.
- ^ Michel Jacq-Hergoualc'h (2002). The Malay Peninsula: Crossroads of the Maritime Silk-Road (100 BCE–1300 CE). Brill. p. 353.
- ^ Roderich Ptak (2004). China, the Portuguese, and the Nanyang. Ashgate. pp. 1, 30.
- ^ Michel Jacq-Hergoualc'h (2002). The Malay Peninsula: Crossroads of the Maritime Silk-Road (100 BCE–1300 CE). Brill. p. 421.
- ^ Michel Jacq-Hergoualc'h (2002). The Malay Peninsula: Crossroads of the Maritime Silk-Road (100 BCE–1300 CE). Brill. pp. 242–243, 423–425.
- ^ Stuart Munro-Hay (2001). Nakhon Sri Thammarat: The Archaeology, History and Legend of a Southern Thai Town. White Lotus Press. pp. 65–66.
- ^ a b เพ็ญสุภา สุขคตะ (28 August 2019). "ปริศนาโบราณคดี l 'สงครามสามนคร' (1): กษัตริย์หริภุญไชยผู้พลัดถิ่นหนีไปแถบเมืองสรรคบุรี?" (in Thai). Matichon. Archived from the original on 25 December 2023. Retrieved 25 December 2023.
- ^ a b เพ็ญสุภา สุขคตะ (12 September 2019). "ปริศนาโบราณคดี : 'สงครามสามนคร' (จบ) : การปรากฏนามของพระเจ้ากัมโพชแห่งกรุงละโว้?" (in Thai). Matichon. Archived from the original on 25 December 2023. Retrieved 25 December 2023.
- ^ "รัชกาลที่ ๒๐ มหาจักรพรรดิพ่อศรีมงคลอาทิตย์ กรุงละโว้ ปี พ.ศ.๑๕๐๓-๑๕๐๔". www.usakanaenew.com (in Thai). 2020. Archived from the original on 23 December 2023. Retrieved 23 December 2023.
- ^ "เส้นทางศรีวิชัย : เครือข่ายทางการค้าที่ยิ่งใหญ่ที่สุดในทะเลใต้ยุคโบราณ ตอน ราชวงศ์ไศเลนทร์ที่จัมบิ (ประมาณ พ.ศ.1395-1533) (ตอนจบ)" (in Thai). Manager Daily. 1 December 2023. Archived from the original on 23 December 2023. Retrieved 23 December 2023.
- ^ Jacq-Hergoualc'h, Michel (2002). The Malay Peninsula: Crossroads of the Maritime Silk Road (100 BC – 1300 AD). Translated by Hobson, Victoria. Brill. ISBN 90-04-11973-6. LCCN 2001035117.
- ^ a b Cœdès, George (1968). The Indianized states of Southeast Asia. University of Hawaii Press. p. 184. ISBN 9780824803681.
belonging to the family of the lotus (padmavamsa)
- ^ Fukami Sumio (2006). "The Rise of Tambralinga and the Southeast Asian Commercial Boom in the Thirteenth Century". XIV International Economic History Congress (72). Helsinki: 4.
Further reading
edit- Sumio Fukami (2004). "The Long 13th Century of Tambralinga: From Javaka to Siam". The Memoirs of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko. 62: 45–79.
- Michel Jacq-Hergoualc'h (2002). "The Situation in the Malay Peninsula in the 10th and 11th Centuries" and "The Commercial Boom in the Malay Peninsula in the 12th and 13th Centuries". The Malay Peninsula: Crossroads of the Maritime Silk-Road (100 BC–1300 AD). Brill. pp. 339–442.
- O. W. Wolters (1958). "Tāmbraliṅga". Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. 21 (3): 587–607. doi:10.1017/S0041977X00060195. S2CID 246638498.; also printed in Vladimir Braginsky, ed. (2002). Classical Civilisations of South East Asia. Routledge Curzon. pp. 84–105.