Carlinal

Sex Pistols

Hi Carlinal. I totally agree with your view here on classic band's & albums. With that in mind, any interesting in helping out at the Sex Pistols FAR - main issue is that the wording is too fan-ish and excitable. Ceoil (talk) 17:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the mention, Ceoil. I'm still a bit of a novice on this website but I'll see what I can do. Carlinal (talk) 17:38, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

I ask as you seem to be thoughtful and know what you are doing. Ceoil (talk) 17:52, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Codewriter1

Hey @Carlinal, when I first started doing this, I thought it would be fun to make or add something on the page I thought would kinda make sense after messing around with the inspect element on different pages for like a year, and tried to make that one page I did look as professionally like any other page. When all of them were changed and I got a message from Binksternet about it, I just felt embarrassed and decided to stop for a while, I wasn't trying to intentionally poorly edit any of the page and then just quit out of anger because of the change, I understood why and just decided to just put it on hold for a while. Codewriter1 (talk) 01:01, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Ah, I get you. Assuming you've had this much interest in Wikipedia for a while, these first batch of edits could've been worse, but at least you have a reasonable viewpoint. On Wikipedia, however, the genre thing is usually generalized and concise, per standards. If you're interested in editing again, try to do what I've done when I'm unsure if my edits are acceptable, by referring to other articles. Have a good break! Carlinal (talk) 03:16, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I'm back, and I did an edit for "Strawberry Fields Forever" and "Penny Lane" by adding Avant-pop in the genre using source material this time that says how the beatles established themselves as "most avant-garde [pop] composers". Codewriter1 (talk) 16:46, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

I'll use this as an opportunity to explain the differences between those edits you mentioned and the edit you did on SMiLE. In order for an album to have a sourced genre included, the specific genre must be explicitly mentioned when referred to in direct connection with the particular album. There are two ways this can be done; either the album is explicitly referred to as of a certain genre or phrase in a sentence or paragraph, or the album is listed in a source titled "50 Cool [Genre] Albums You Should Give a Listen" or something.

Your edits linking both "Strawberry Fields Forever" and "Penny Lane" as both avant-pop are interesting, although they do not qualify. While the page you sourced from Simonelli's book does refer to the Beatles as "the most avant-garde composers of the postwar era" and the two songs and Sgt. Pepper are undoubtedly pop music, "avant-pop" is not mentioned anywhere in the book nor referred to in connection to the songs. On the other hand, you made a stronger case of SMiLE being both a musique concrète album and an Americana album. The former and its sources have the phrase mentioned enough in relation to the album to the point where the album can indeed be shown as a major demonstration of said genre. In the latter case, although it's been disputed, the mentions of Americana are prominent enough in the body of the article and how they influenced the album's music. SMiLE is perhaps a looser case of an Americana album, but it's strong enough to remain.

While the exotica part subsequently got reasonably reverted for being too loose or unfounded of a connection, your current SMiLE edit is a good effort. I also wanted to state that for genres in infoboxes, remember that they must usually remain specific yet concise in regards to the genres an album is most notably related to. Thanks for asking about this! You're learning well! Carlinal (talk) 06:17, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, but I did made a big mistake on You Know My Name (Look Up the Number) yesterday(which I did planned to this few weeks before I got the hang of putting a link next to the genre) by adding music hall and bossa nova just because it was in the sentence on its page and the link of the website didn't mention music hall at all, which I should've check, but it did mention the song as a bossa nova tune, and the guy who corrected it warn me if I did this again, I'll be blocked from editing, so I'm kinda nervous, but thanks for the advice, I think it'll help me with this.

Also, comedy and experimental rock is in the category for the song but not on the genre in the infobox. Is it because there's no source to put them on the genre in the infobox but it's still categorized as the genre for the song, same thing for psychedelic pop for smile. It's the reason I didn't put them in the infobox just to make sure. Codewriter1 (talk) 23:18, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

These are good to know. I suggest you put off with genre-related edits for a while and focus on some minor corrections, so that you can garner more experience in properly adding references. The external link categories are of a looser nature than what's listed in infoboxes, but it's best not to get into those as well yet.

I also wanna say that if you're not entirely sure about a certain edit, it's better to ask about it in the article's talk page or look through its edit history to see if similar edits have been done before or accepted. Sometimes there are frequent contributors seen in the edit history, and perhaps you can ask those particular people about it then.

I hope this section provided enough advice for you altogether. I don't think I'm that fit of a helper for other Wikipedians, I'm not that experienced regardless. Good luck! Carlinal (talk) 20:13, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Notice glitch

Hey @Jauerback! I wanted to ask you if you're aware of a notice glitch that appears whenever someone edits articles, as in there's always one notice added. It's been appearing on both platforms I use Wikipedia with so I speculate it has something to do with more general coding. Are there any news/updates about this? Carlinal (talk) 08:09, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

I'm not aware of it. You might want to check at either the Help Desk or maybe the Village Pump. 13:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC) Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 13:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your help! I found the appropriate thread of this problem. Carlinal (talk) 21:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Glitch is gone! :D Carlinal (talk) 21:37, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

SMiLE

Hey, thanks for your improvements to various Beach Boys articles. On Smile I just tried to add a remark from Van Dyke about how he was displeased with the "abstract" direction Brian was going in by early 1967, which is something I'd never heard straight from the horse's mouth before, and seemed to clarify the adjacent secondary source about "the music not being sophisticated enough", which I'd always wondered about. Then my edit was reverted by another editor for being "unneeded". I don't want to get blocked or start a debate with them over something so minor, so if you feel that that was a detail worth adding, then please restore it. Thanks. 2601:192:8802:6FA0:455A:8ADC:7B:606F (talk) 00:50, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello 2601:192:8802, it's a pleasure to talk to you! I'm very grateful of the edits you've done on that article, I think ILIL would be proud. Looking through the revision history since my last edit, about half of Binksternet's edits are appropriate. I have several comments regarding these;

• I honestly don't know what else to say in defense for the group photo and its section; compared to the rest of the article, the photo itself still looks useful, but the info surrounding it is perhaps not.
• Carl's quote on releasing SMiLE in 1976 should be restored as the last quote in the section, but not block-quoted.
• I think you did a good move with Parks's objection to releasing Vega-Tables as a single. The "abstract" quote on the other hand, that seems redundant. Compared to Anderle's quote, I think "too abstract" and "too unsophisticated" are similar enough to not warrant both quotes being included.

In general, I'm surprised someone actually considered the group photo information and some images to be irrelevant. To me, this also means that there's finally a sufficient amount of necessary information about SMiLE to give in this article. Besides expanding the personnel section, I think it's time this article deserves some more focus on polishing and info organization and maybe even a peer review. It's a hell of a read. Thanks again for your efforts!

If you don't mind, in exchange for this, I'm asking if you could look through the latest section I added in the talk page for Pet Sounds. I'm hoping someone would recognize the sources I put up; I'm considering them for the Capitol release, legacy section, and perceived storyline sections respectively. It's 5:05 AM as I'm typing this, perhaps I'll do the SMiLE suggestions myself, but otherwise these notes should be put up. Thanks for visiting! Carlinal (talk) 09:07, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Regarding the group photo, how does it affect the Smile album? It reflects on Brian's career trajectory, but not the album directly.

The article is getting too large. It loses focus if it spends that much time on the dissolution of Brian, and the falling apart of the band. These ideas can be developed at the band and Brian articles. Binksternet (talk) 15:00, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Oh hello :)

Some of the info on Brian's mental decline and the Beach Boys should definitely be moved to their respective articles, and I think a "Further information" section leading to Wilson's article could be added around this section. I'll see what I can do about SMiLE in a few days, I have to move for a vacation. Thanks for your contributions, Bink. Carlinal (talk) 15:09, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

I thought for a bit on the group photo. It should definitely be returned.

My reasoning is that regardless of its inherent value in itself, the photo represents the extent of Wilson's engagement in wanting himself and the Beach Boys to be part of a progressive, countercultural society, and illustrates the article's section about his associates vividly, showing the amount of people he accrued, the amount that believed in him and the album he was producing at the time, and the amount that hung around his house and were later banned from visiting throughout SMiLE's development. It hints to the reader the chaoticness of Wilson's social circle and the eventual negative effects that led to SMiLE's cancellation. Alternatively, it can be seen as how disconnected Wilson was with his bandmates by that point. As for its image caption in the last article it was in, I'm unsure if it needs shortening, but the main thing in the image is showing Brian Wilson's devotion towards the album and the circle of people that influenced him. Carlinal (talk) 05:07, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Vent/Confession

I'm quite relieved that RockabillyRaccoon is permanently blocked today. Looking at the reasoning it's because their edits as a genre warrior and behavior in talk pages were very stubborn and abrasive. Once you expand an infobox's genre list to over four it gets cluttered. It should've been obvious. "Alternative" as a label exists probably in part to resolve situations like this, heh. That's not my biggest point of concern, however. Ever since I saw their edits on the images to the album covers of Pet Sounds and Let It Bleed, I realized that damage was already done long before them, and throughout this summer I checked their user contributions page almost every day specifically and only in the hopes to revert similar mistakes, including but not limited to the covers of Ace of Spades, Dirt, and a few Mushroomhead albums. Only image-related edits. It was never personal, I never cared for everything else they did. Just that not all of their images were higher quality replacements. Some were just to get the images 16 pixels smaller. I assume all of these were in good faith, and about 1 in 8 of the uploaded covers in that period were lower quality or unnecessary. Especially when you wouldn't go further than Discogs or Amazon as a source. I should write an essay about this. The YouTube Music page has the highest quality version of the cover to The Joshua Tree.

I'm a little guilty doing all those reverts and replacement edits and such. Even if all our actions are public I was basically stalking. I wonder how I could've done things a little better, and I thought about messaging their talk page, but I was unsure of the best way to word my intentions. I guess considering a certain someone got called a "Mini-Hitler" by Raccoon my efforts would've been for naught regardless. At least I was brought to more obscure articles to improve. Carlinal (talk) 23:07, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

There's a difference between "permanent" and "indefinite". On Wikipedia, an indefinite block can be appealed and lifted. You may want to consider how you'll react to the reactivation of RR. Binksternet (talk) 02:52, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

That's interesting to know, thanks for pointing that out. If their account does get reactivated from an appeal, I'll likely expect the same from them as you. Carlinal (talk) 17:51, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

New standard

Regarding the recent additions of discography pages to musical group infoboxes, does it only apply to bands or solo artists as well? Also, was it officially decided upon, and if so, is there a link? Thanks. HPSR (talk) 01:45, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure it applies to anybody with a significant footing in music, including a discography page. But the only stuff I heard came from this section. I'll ping you there so we can ask more questions about it. Carlinal (talk) 02:03, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Very well; the proposition does include any artists/actors with a body of work. It appears my question was already answered. I've already added a handful of discography page parameters to notable artists' infoboxes and will keep an eye out for more. Cheers. HPSR (talk) 02:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

ヾ(＾-＾)ノ Carlinal (talk) 02:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Hey, Carlinal, I wanted to thank you for helping to add this to music infoboxes! It's such a genius idea that it's funny in retrospect that it wasn't done years ago. I check band articles ALL THE TIME because I want to review or remind myself of some discography bit (release years, which songs were singles, etc.). So helpful to have the link right there. Thanks again! CAVincent (talk) 06:12, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

You're welcome! Hey, I'll do y'all one better. Why not implement YouTube album playlists into their respective infoboxes as well? I'll be more than glad to outline what I meant. The platform's got everything licensed by this point, amirite? Carlinal (talk) 06:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

first

I started a discussion on Talk:Firsts in animation and wondering if you would like to join Fan Of Lion King 🦁 (talk) 19:24, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

With due respect, I'm not really interested. Perhaps another time. Carlinal (talk) 21:16, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about List of Beatles members

Hello, Carlinal

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Pichpich and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect List of Beatles members, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 17 § List of Beatles members.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pichpich}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Pichpich (talk) 16:11, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Aight, cool. Nice too meet you too! Carlinal (talk) 16:22, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Almost Top 100

Hi Carlinal, I just wanted to let you know that I’m removing the Do Not Archive tag on my Almost Top 100 post as I’ve moved the list to the List of Top 100 Games by Number of Referenced Sources. You are free to repost your link from the Almost Top 100 article to over there if you desire. XJJSX (talk) 19:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Ok cool, I don't have anything against that. :) Carlinal (talk) 19:46, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

A virtual Christmas card from me to you

This video just got uploaded and I thought it'd be fun to share here. Have a merry December! Carlinal (talk) 20:04, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Red Luigi

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Red Luigi has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Huh? I'm sorry if I did something wrong, this was just another redirect and was always intended as one. I have created dozens of redirects before, some that you have reviewed, and there was no problem I can recall whatsoever. I didn't see anything unusual with "Red Luigi" especially since "Green Mario" is also a redirect that was standing by the time I created this one. Lastly, there was no warning or anything while I was creating a page of this title in particular. If there's any specific discussion about "Red Luigi" I need to know about, I'd be happy to be shown the link to it. And, uh, would be better linked to the remains of this deleted page, I guess? Thanks. Carlinal (talk) 17:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Ah. Wait, I see now. Somehow I wasn't shown the linked discussion or forgot. There was no malice behind this. Thanks again! Carlinal (talk) 17:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Grateful Dead Hornsby Revert

Hello Carlinal. You reverted my addition of Bruce Hornsby as a member of the Grateful Dead stating ‘It's been proven that Hornsby was never a full-time member…’. As a lifelong fan, I am hoping you can provide a reputable citation supporting this claim. 136.37.147.223 (talk) 15:28, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

It's a little complicated since the Grateful Dead's live performances are just as prominent as their studio works, but from what I know Hornsby never became anymore involved with the Dead than touring. I reverted your edit in the infobox because of this technicality in that a band member does not qualify if they were only for touring. I never read anything about Hornsby appearing in any of their studio albums, and despite him inducting the other Grateful Dead members into the Rock Hall he himself isn't one, perhaps in relation to this technicality. Though he is no less beloved, I understand.

This interview mentions Hornsby as part of the Dead's "traveling roadshow", which is the best citation I can come up with. But if you can find a studio album with his credit on it then I'll be interested to know. That's my process of thought. Carlinal (talk) 17:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

If that is the reasoning, Vince Welnick should not be recognized as a member as he was not credited on any studio album. 136.37.147.223 (talk) 17:13, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

I guess by that logic Welnick wouldn't be considered a member either. At this point that's as much as I can help you with, I'm a bit of a passerby. Since you're a Deadhead, I suggest you take it to the article's talk page to sort things out. There's already consensus on Hornsby not being considered a member, and you can elaborate your opinions there. My apologies for any confusion. Carlinal (talk) 18:55, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the discussion and suggestion. I’ll see where the talk takes me. EazyAnswers (talk) 19:55, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Removing parameters that are not filled out in infoboxes; WP:ALT

Hello. I've noticed that on several album articles you have removed parameters that are not filled out in the infobox, and called the edits "tweaks". Per Template:Infobox album: "Do not remove fields from this list when the value is unknown; in that case the values should be left blank." There is nothing wrong with having blank parameters in infoboxes like recorded= and studio=, so they don't need to be removed. Wikipedia will never be complete, and having blank parameters that still apply to all albums shows we do not yet have that information to editors. Per WP:ALT, alt= for images should not be removed even if is not filled out, so please do not remove that parameter. Thanks. Ss112 11:53, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

That's a good argument. Thanks for the comment! I'll try not to repeat similar edits from here on. Carlinal (talk) 14:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Potential dispute on Undertale

I recently made an edit on Undertale as you probably know. I got reverted by User:Ferret who said that the old terminology is "better overall and better supported by the narrative", whatever that means. (Yes, I know I did say to revert me if I made an error, but I was referring to my overall small amount of knowledge on the subject due to me never having actually played the game, not to stuff like this.) As I see you thanked me on that edit I invite you to weigh in on the matter if you have anything to say. The discussion is happening on Talk:Undertale. TypoEater (talk) 19:21, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Reading the relevant section it seems it got resolved already without any further contributions from me. I don't think the aforementioned information and acronyms are beyond a minor edit anyhow. And I'm certain ferret took your efforts in good faith with a well-laid rebuttal and all. Just another day for me. Article is at its best regardless. Thanks for your efforts anyway! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Carlinal (talk) 22:11, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Yeah sorry, I posted this on your page at around the same time I posted it on the talk page and Ferret's page. It got resolved pretty quick, but I still feel like the situation could have been easily avoided if Ferret had given me specifics when I asked for specifics. TypoEater (talk) 14:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Emblem Bowser.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Emblem Bowser.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 23:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Brian Jones

Is it unnecessary? The old wording makes it sound like he died as an incumbent band member! (Not everyone just knows the story.) Romomusicfan (talk) 15:41, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, it is. We just don't add such tiny details over someone's tenure in a band. (I will add it's unusual for Jones to die so soon after his departure, but then again it was the 1960s.) It's not much to worry about anyway, as the band members section comes after a whole lotta history, so readers should understand Jones didn't die during his time as a member. Carlinal (talk) 15:50, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Note: This notification was triggered due to your recent edits to Sweet Baby Inc.

⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 07:10, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Just wanna say thank you for adding the contentious topics notice on the talk page. I'll do my best to handle what I give myself there. Carlinal (talk) 16:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Update to template transcluded on your userpage

I wish to inform you that as a result of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User hate CCP, one of the userboxes on your user page has been modified. If you are content with this change, you may leave it as-is. If you dislike this change, you may remove the userbox, reword it, or replace it with something else, as long as you do not restore the word "hate" or another word that is likely to be similarly offensive. If you have any questions, you may ask me on my talk page. Best wishes, —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 19:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the adjustment and reminder. The reword is good. I wouldn't mind if consensus led to a deletion, if that's of any note. Carlinal (talk) 21:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Redirect query

Hello, with regards to a redirect you created, D4C, please can you advise if this is a recognised term, or one you have self created? I came across it during NPP but have not been able to verify if it's credible or phantom. Thanks. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Googling "D4C" shows it is an abbreviated term for the JoJo's Bizarre Adventure character, and I presume it's a localized name as well for copyright reasons. I was aware that the character is clearly named after the AC/DC album but wasn't entirely sure what the redirect target should be considering the shout-out. The Google search also shows other definitions of D4C but I'm certain the most common definition would be either the album or the character. Carlinal (talk) 17:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

With respect, from a cursory glance, it appears to be "recognised" on fandom and another wiki. When I said recognised, I meant beyond fan sites, as I couldn't say how it would be perceived in an rfd. That said, I am inclined to let someone else consider it for review if your reasoning is plausible. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Possibly mistaken edit

You did nothing to genres here. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:55, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Force of habit with previous edits over genre parameters. 😛 I definitely meant studio parameter. Thank you and sorry! Carlinal (talk) 05:45, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Is there any reason why you did this? Is there some consensus that you shouldn't list a state in an infobox? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

It's standard procedure to include just the city. I've seen this formatting in so many album and song articles, and personally I consider the listing of state and country (akin to what's seen on main artist infoboxes) excessive. Carlinal (talk) 07:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Since it's not obligatory per WP:ALBUMSTYLE, please undo this change. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Sure. It's reverted now. You're welcome! Carlinal (talk) 08:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks kindly. Have a good one. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Special delivery :)

		The Userpage Barnstar
		I love your userpage design, especially the advice. Keep it up!! – The Sharpest Lives (💬•✏️•ℹ️) (ping me!) 19:07, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Oh LOL, thanks! I mean, besides it being as me as it can get, I never thought it'd be worthy of a barnstar like this. I'm really flattered.

I guess this is reason enough to state I've been having second thoughts about the advice section and the related. There was a deletion discussion over one of my infoboxes, and since then I'm giving the advice section second thoughts over potentially being WP:SOAPBOX. At the same time, I've been mulling over the idea of an additional section laying out my political beliefs, since I wish to be a proper activist. I'm unsure on that appropriateness as I'm also trying to get a job, maybe it should be kept considering what's happening this year. Maybe it wouldn't hurt to put these into collapsables? Lastly there's been some privacy concerns and I'm planning to talk to someone for a review or something, though I haven't had the time since, well, I'm in school.

All in all, my userpage defininitely needs a big update since it doesn't reflect my experience now, but it'll be bigger at least :) Thanks again for the delivery, and rock on. 🤘 Carlinal (talk) 22:00, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi

hi 😶 Gdfctjmm (talk) 02:09, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Uh...hello. Looks like you're a newcomer, so I'll say welcome to Wikipedia. I receive talk page comments on my email, so your message initially appeared like a spam number to me, heh. I looked through your contributions and, while I think you're certainly not a vandal, these comments are just off-putting enough that I feel the need to type all this out. Forgive me if I'm too uptight.

I don't think you violated the talk page guidelines, not yet at least. IMO though, comments like this are disruptive, as I take my talk page a little seriously. I treat Wikipedia as a bit of a job since it's volunteer work, and your comments are sorta like putting sticky notes in everyone's office spaces. It's not vandalism, but it's gonna get annoying as you've done this over ten times already, maybe pointless already. You should comment on talk pages only when to communicate something important and it can't be resolved through edits and edit summaries.

If you're eager to interact with Wikipedians on the other hand, the best way to do that is by being a good contributor yourself and engaging in thoughtful conversations. In my experience I got to interact with such great people, including but not limited to koavf (currently banned but still good-hearted, I digress), Popcornfud, Rhain, NegativeMP1, Vaughan J. and PantheonRadiance, just to name some experts. If you contribute thoughtfully, perhaps it's likely you'll interact with someone as great as them.

I don't have problems with your account so far, and I hope you'll put it to good use improving articles and whatnot. Regardless, can you stop these comments? I'm sorry and I get they're friendly, and Wikipedia needs a little light now and then, but these greetings just don't add anything. If you need help, some trial-and-error learning and studying other editors may be just as helpful. Just keep editing and getting more experienced, and who knows how far that road will go. I'll be happy to see it! Cheers! Carlinal (talk) 07:59, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Ok Gdfctjmm (talk) 11:51, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Surreal Barnstar
	Look at that user page, you almost wrote a novel there! 𝙲𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚞𝚜 𝚁𝚘𝚗𝚒𝚗 (talk) 20:45, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

LMAO. It needs to reach a novel's length soon; some of these sections will receive giant updates, LOL. Thanks for the honor! Toasts from one ADHD-Autistic to another. Carlinal (talk) 21:08, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)