Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:

  • Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.
    • Thus, if I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here. I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
  • Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
    • Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
    • Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
  • To initiate a new conversation on this page click on this link.
  • If you are expressing a concern about edits made by RussBot, it is extremely helpful if you include a link to a specific page or, even better, a link to a diff showing the actual edit that the bot made. This makes it much easier to diagnose and correct problems.
  • You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).

The da Vinci Barnstar

edit
  The da Vinci Barnstar
For your recent exceptional work in kicking User:DPL bot in places which must have hurt. Narky Blert (talk) 21:15, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! :-) R'n'B (call me Russ) 21:20, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Special Barnstar
Thanks for you hard work in maintaining Wikipedia. Txantimedia (talk) 18:21, 18 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


A pie for you!

edit
  For helping out fixing all those disambig links on all the new Hisatsu Orange Railway pages, much appreciated! :) RubenSchade (talk) 00:12, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


Some baklava for you!

edit
  G Hotors497F? (talk) 23:45, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Barnstar of Diplomacy
Uepp Hotors497F? (talk) 23:47, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For running the disambiguation contest month after month, there are not enough barnstars in the world. BD2412 T 17:09, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply


Expiatory chapels

edit

Hello
I came across this term on a number of pages recently and added some links (viz. this, on 27 Oct); you subsequently changed them to something else. As the link I added went to the Votive Church page, which explains the term, and your link (which uses more text) goes to a page that doesn’t, how exactly was that an improvement? Moonraker12 (talk) 19:54, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps I was too hasty. Votive church is a disambiguation page, and if that's the only Wikipedia page that explains what an "expiatory chapel" is, that's a problem. In this case, I think the problem is that Votive church is a broad-concept article that's been incorrectly marked as a disambiguation page. In other words, there are churches that have "Votive" in the name that need to be disambiguated, but we also need an article (not a disambiguation page) that explains the overall concept of what a votive church is. The current page could probably be improved to serve that function with a few references to reliable sources. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 22:33, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello, again (and my apologies for the delay in replying!) I did think, on looking back over this, that it was something to do with the dab page tag, and I agree, it does seem to be misplaced. So I have raised the issue there, if you wish to chip in. Anyway, thanks for the explanation, and for your comments: Regards, Moonraker12 (talk) 23:28, 18 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Don't delete Margaret D. Nadauld article

edit

Could I please get your help? Someone has nominated the article Margaret D. Nadauld for deletion, claiming that Nadauld is not notable. It was the same person who did it 6 years ago. I'd appreciate if you could support keeping it. See the talk page on that article for my arguments why she's notable, or peruse the article's 25+ references yourself. Personally, I believe the person who proposed deletion deserves a trout for claiming that she's not notable, given the contents of those sources. If you please, just follow the deletion discussion link, edit, and add a line at the bottom similar to the following:

Tech News: 2024-50

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 22:13, 9 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-51

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 22:22, 16 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Kathi people

edit

Several books and articles are all present in the in a the government libraries and preserved in a very good manner by the princely states of Kathiawar.

Sources by James Tod are very reliable and also of Annals and  Antiques of Rajasthan  have already proven its worth.  Hsjebalia (talk) 22:25, 26 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – January 2025

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).

  Administrator changes

  Sennecaster
 
 

  CheckUser changes

 
  Worm That Turned
  Ferret

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous