Welcome!

edit
 
Welcome!

Hello, Tapazi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Rahio1234 11:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Visvaldis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orthodox. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:11, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Battle of Inčukalns moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Inčukalns. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:12, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

hello, I didn't plan to submit but thank you for moving it to drafts, but I already finished the article, if you could check it and accept it, it would mean a lot to me Tapazi (talk) 15:36, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Inčukalns (August 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:42, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for being honest, there are couple of websites about the Battle of Inčukalns and I might use them in the future, but if you could, can you check my other 2 Wikipedia Draft pages?
1.Ako - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ako_(ruler)
2.Battle of Riga (1919) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Battle_of_Riga_(1919) Tapazi (talk) 09:13, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Tapazi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:42, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ako (ruler) has been accepted

edit
 
Ako (ruler), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 19:13, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Riga (1919) has been accepted

edit
 
Battle of Riga (1919), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 15:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Inčukalns (October 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 04:39, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Is that source the only source worried about? I could find another website or use my other main source to switch them if so. Tapazi (talk) 09:59, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply