Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NomadBSD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:23, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NomadBSD

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod removed so I'm bringing it here. No references outside of its own website. Fails WP:GNG Notfrompedro (talk) 01:52, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: No evidence of proper BEFORE as some obvious hits on the search links, though at leat typically not RS. The book hits seem to tell false positves. [1] is a "go to" place for a quick overview. Probably not worth a redirect link. 07:49, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:09, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment A Google News search yields a few sources dedicated to NomadBSD. For instance, itsfoss, ComputerBase, and Root.cz. A regular Google search yields sources from FreeBDS News, Phoronix, and PocketMags. Searching Google Books yields some sources that I think appear relevant, but there are no previews available. Searching the Internet Archive and newspapers.com yields nothing useful. Based on an WP:RSN discussion (here) Phoronix appears to be no more reliable than a blog. The other sources are not discussed at RSN at all, but they don’t appear to have editorial boards or fact checking staff and I would question their reliability. TipsyElephant (talk) 14:38, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete created by new user; it exists but there's nothing more here. Google search has some results, but nothing to support an article. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 01:17, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:07, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the sources I found do not demonstrate notability and no one else has presented potential sources. TipsyElephant (talk) 11:29, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.