This Wikipedia page has been superseded by Wikipedia:Essay directory and is retained primarily for historical reference. |
This essays in a nutshell page summarizes the gist of user written essays on Wikipedia. Essays can also be navigated via categories, navigation templates, or Special:Search. For a listing and more information on navigating essays, see Wikipedia:Essay directory. Essays may represent widespread norms or minority viewpoints. Consider these views with discretion. Essays are not Wikipedia policies. |
The following are summaries of essays written by users on Wikipedia. This list is incomplete. If you have an essay, or know of an essay that's not included, feel free to add it to the list. Wikipedia also has an introduction for aspiring contributors that provides information and resources on the basics needed to comprehend, comment on, and edit to Wikipedia.
Editing
editEssay | In a nutshell | Shortcuts | Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Advanced article editing | There are techniques that can make the editing of Wikipedia articles faster and more convenient. | WP:EDITFAST | Low |
Amnesia test | If you can't write an article after leaving all your prior knowledge about the subject behind, it fails the amnesia test, and regardless of how many external links you can dig up that relate to the subject, those links don't satisfy notability guidelines. | WP:AMNESIA, WP:FORGET | Low |
An article is the sum of its parts | The impact of any individual contribution should be considered in regards to the tone and perspective of the article as a whole. | WP:PIECEMEAL, WP:PIECE | Unranked |
Avoid mission statements | Mission statements rarely tell us much and should generally not be transcribed in full in Wikipedia articles. | WP:MISSION, WP:SLOGAN | Low |
Avoid prelimit of articles as if excluding many of 54 cards | Don't exclude details from articles if the complexity of the subject demands it. | WP:54CARDS | Unranked |
Beef up that first revision | The articles for deletion and speedy deletion processes would be greatly better off if editors put out solid, substantive drafts as the first mainspace revision of an article rather than just a few lines and the promise that an article will grow in the future. | WP:BEEF | Low |
Cherrypicking | Do not cherrypick. When selecting information from a source, include contradictory and significant qualifying information from the same source. | WP:CHERRYPICKING WP:CHERRY-PICKING WP:CHERRYPICK WP:CHERRY-PICK |
Mid |
Contributing to Wikipedia | The main page that provides information, links, videos and other resources on the basics needed to comprehend, comment on, and contribute to Wikipedia. | WP:HOW WP:CTW |
High |
Dictionaries as sources | Dictionaries and glossaries present special challenges and limitations. | WP:DICTS WP:DICTIONARIES |
|
Don't overload your watchlist! | A watchlist becomes harder to navigate the longer it is. Only watch articles that need watching. | WP:OVERLOAD | Unranked |
Don't teach the controversy | (That doesn't mean what you think it means.) Instead, neutrally document the conflict. | WP:DTTC WP:NDTC |
|
Edit count | Edit counters are a useful tool, but remember that it's the quality of edits that counts, not the quantity. | WP:EC, WP:EDITCOUNT | Low |
Editing on mobile devices | Editing on Wikipedia can be done on mobile devices, but beware of the challenges. | WP:DEVICES | Unranked |
Editors are not mindreaders | Put yourself in the shoes of other editors. How can they distinguish the incomplete, unreferenced article you've just created but plan to improve from one that will never be improved? | WP:MINDREADER | Low |
Endorsements | In light of BLP, commercial endorsements usually should not be reported in the present tense. Other care also should be applied. | WP:ENDORSEMENT WP:ENDORSEMENTS WP:ENDORSE WP:ENDORSED |
|
Example cruft | Writing an encyclopedic entry about a subject will involve generalizations. Avoid the temptation to engage in original research by finding every example of a phenomenon, or every exception to a phenomenon. | WP:GENERALIZE, WP:EXAMPLES, WP:EXCEPTION, WP:EXAMPLEFARM | Unranked |
Featured articles may have problems | Featured articles are not necessarily to be emulated; focus on our policies and guidelines | WP:ARTICLEPROBLEM | Low |
Minors and persons judged incompetent | In light of BLP, editing about minors and persons legally judged incompetent should be especially protective of their rights. | WP:MINORS WP:INCOMPETENTS |
|
Give an article a chance | Don't be too hasty in nominating newly-created articles for deletion. Remember that some people don't have as much free time to edit as others and that we shouldn't bite the newbies. | WP:CHANCE | Low |
Not editing because of Wikipedia restriction | If your planned article or editing would conflict with Wikipedia's standards, it's happened before. No website can be everything for everyone. Examples follow. | WP:NOTEDITING WP:NOEDITING WP:NOTEDIT WP:NOTWRITING WP:NOWRITING WP:NOTWRITE WP:NOWRITE |
|
Nothing is in stone | Wikipedia is always bound to change | WP:STONE | Low |
For publicists publicizing a client's work | Publicists may want tips on legitimately reporting clients' achievements and have their articles stay in Wikipedia, not deleted. | WP:PUBLICITY WP:PUBLICIST WP:PUBLICISTS |
|
Robotic editing | Robotic editing is the manual performance of the same or similar edit to multiple, perhaps numerous pages. | Mid | |
There is a deadline | If the preservation or survivability of the knowledge is at stake, contribute it to Wikipedia before it's too late. | WP:TIAD | Mid |
There is no deadline | Wikipedia is a work in progress. Don't rush to edit, it's not a competition. | WP:TIND, WP:NORUSH, WP:DEADLINE | Mid |
Vague introductions | Explain the subject of the article concisely in the lead. The lead should summarize the contents of the article. | WP:VAI | Mid |
Why Johnny can't wiki-read | Techniques to improve the readability of articles. | WP:JOHNNY | Unranked |
Wikipedia is a volunteer service | The editors on Wikipedia are mainly volunteers. Editors can contribute as much as they want, and however long they desire. | WP:VOLUNTEER | Low |
Wikipedia is a work in progress | Wikipedia is constantly being improved and expanded, and it will never be finished. | WP:WIP, WP:WNF, WP:NOTDONE, WP:NOTFINISHED, WP:WORKINPROGRESS | Mid |
Wikipedia is not being written in an organized fashion | Wikipedia grows organically, thus the quality of pages is varied. | WP:ORGANIZE | Low |
Write the article first | Editors are encouraged to write the article on a given subject before adding a link to the article on list pages, disambiguation pages, or templates. | WP:WTAF | Low |
Writing better articles | A guide on layout and style, and how to make an article clear, precise and relevant to the reader. | WP:BETTER | Mid |
Formatting and style
edit
Essay | In a nutshell | Shortcuts | Impact |
---|---|---|---|
98 percent table width anomaly | Tables in class wikitable or infobox, wider than 98%, trigger bottom scroll bars. Use margin-right:0 or infobox margin-left:0 to avoid the scrollbar and allow full width. | WP:98WIDE | Low |
Advanced footnote formatting | Remote footnotes can be added for pronunciations or examples. Footnotes can be indented, line-split and shortened by deferring details into References or External links. Due to a WP quirk, the 1st footnote on a page might not indent properly. Beware websites violating copyrights. | Low | |
Advanced table formatting | Techniques to improve the display or editing of wikitables in Wikipedia | WP:ADTABLE | Low |
Advanced template coding | Techniques to improve the display or editing of templates in Wikipedia. | WP:ADTEMPLATE | Low |
Advanced text formatting | Techniques to control or adjust the alignment of text on a page. | WP:TYPESET | Low |
Autosizing images | Techniques to auto-size, or scale, any image ("thumb" or "frameless"). | WP:Autosizing, WP:Scaling, WP:AUTOSIZE, WP:SCALE | Low |
Avoiding text gaps | Text gaps may appear on certain browsers, but not on others. Be careful to avoid accidentally creating them. | WP:TEXTGAP | Unranked |
Avoiding Wikipedia quirks | There are many quirks on Wikipedia, but they have workarounds. | WP:QUIRK | Low |
Bare URLs | Simply copying and pasting the URL of an online reference is not helpful in the event of linkrot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources. | WP:BURL, WP:BURLS | Unranked |
Don't draw misleading graphs | Graphs should accurately represent the context of the data. | Low | |
Don't leave giant breaks between sections | Avoid whitespace and fix it if spotted. | WP:GIANTBREAKS | Low |
Emerson | If you quote "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds" at someone, odds are you are making a fool of yourself, since it has nothing to do with writing-style consistency, but political inflexibility. Plus you're just being an uncivil WP:JERK on purpose. | WP:HOBGOBLIN | |
Graphs and charts | How to create and use graphs and charts on Wikipedia. | Unranked | |
Overlink crisis | Avoid overlinking Wikipedia pages, especially in navboxes or infoboxes. | WP:LINKCRISIS | Low |
Common-style fallacy | Wikipedia has its own set of policies and guidelines for article content and naming (which are distinct from each other). Facts on a subject are drawn from reliable sources, but no particular subset of them (e.g. news publishers) dictates how Wikipedia must write. Style is a matter of Wikipedia community consensus, based on general-audience style guides, not mimicry of any particular genre (or trademark). | WP:COMMONSTYLE, WP:CSF | Unranked |
Specialized-style fallacy | Wikipedia has its own set of guidelines for article layout and naming. Facts on a subject should be drawn from reliable sources, but how content is styled is a matter for the Wikipedia community and with everyone in mind, not just for specialists who usually write for academic journals or other single-field publications and their limited audiences. | WP:SPECIALSTYLE, WP:SSF | Unranked |
Walled garden | Articles should have outgoing and incoming links to the wider encyclopedia. Don't create a group of articles that exclusively link to each other. | WP:WG, WP:WALL | Low |
Stubs and short articles
editEssay | In a nutshell | Shortcuts | Impact |
---|---|---|---|
An unfinished house is a real problem | An unfinished article is not a harmless thing. As such you should make it accurate and readable before saving. | WP:REALPROBLEM | Low |
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built | An article too short to provide more than rudimentary information about a subject should be marked as a stub and edited, and expanded, rather than simply deleted. | WP:INSPECTOR, WP:DEMOLISH, WP:DONOTDEMOLISH | Low |
Don't hope the house will build itself | A little planning and a little effort is all that is needed to prevent an article from being deleted. | WP:BUILDER | Low |
Make stubs | Why make a red link, when you can make a stub? | WP:MAKESTUBS | Low |
One sentence does not an article make | One sentence "articles" and "essays" should be deleted as not worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. | WP:1S, WP:2S, WP:1 SENTENCE, WP:2 SENTENCES | Low |
Put a little effort into it | When creating a new article, even if it is a stub, try to put in at least a little bit more than just the absolute minimum. | WP:PUTEFFORT, WP:LITTLEEFFORT | Low |
Use of templates
editEssay | In a nutshell | Shortcuts | Impact |
---|---|---|---|
A navbox on every page | Navbox templates can be useful as a tool for navigation. | WP:NBFILL, WP:ANOEP | Low |
Alternatives to the "Expand" template | Avoid using {{expand}} templates. There are alternatives. | WP:ALTEXPAND, WP:EXPANDALTS | Unranked |
Avoid template creep | Don't overuse templates. Keep it simple, stupid! | WP:ATC, WP:TCREEP | Low |
Clarify the cleanup | Use a specific cleanup template other than {{cleanup}}. | WP:CTC, WP:CCLEANUP | Low |
Navigation template | A navigation template is a template that links between multiple articles belonging to the same topic. There are two types of navigation templates, navigation boxes, or navboxes, and sidebars. | WP:NAV | High |
Not everything needs a navbox | Navbox templates can be useful as a tool for navigation, but use them sparingly. | WP:NENAN | Low |
Responsible tagging | If you identify problems in an article but don't have the knowledge or time to fix them yourself, please take care to only add the most relevant and specific tags, and leave an explanation on the talk page so that others can understand what the problem was and determine if they can do anything to fix it. | WP:RESPTAG | Mid |
Tag bombing | Adding multiple tags without explaining the reason is disruptive. | WP:TAGBOMB | Low |
Tagging pages for problems | It is important to clearly and concisely identify problems with Wikipedia pages to allow other editors to fix them. | WP:TAGGING | Low |
Templates are lazy | We have templates. They're great. Don't use them when you don't need to. | WP:LAZY | Low |
Too many boxes | Be Free. Think outside the Box. | WP:NOBOX, WP:UNBOX | Unranked |