User talk:Panamitsu

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2023/May; 2023/June; 2023/September; 2023/October; 1; 2;

This is Panamitsu's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Proposed deletion of List of discontinued Guinness World Records

The article List of discontinued Guinness World Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Failure to meet WP:NLIST

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dingers5Days (talk) 16:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Edmonds (brand)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Edmonds (brand) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 01:25, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Paora

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Paora you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 02:21, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Paora

The article Paora you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Paora and Talk:Paora/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 02:45, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Paora

The article Paora you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Paora for comments about the article, and Talk:Paora/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 10:44, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good work on getting this to GA. I have two updates for you:

You may have seen that it's now scheduled for homepage exposure as the lead hook (i.e. with the photo)
Ron Magill wanted to be kept informed when it's due to appear, so I've emailed him; I also took the opportunity to ask whether there's further reporting on the new enclosure that he wanted to share.

I'll let you know if anything arrives, or I'll deal with it myself. Schwede 66 02:46, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice thanks for keeping me posted. ―Panamitsu (talk) 05:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination (award) Get on Wikipedia

How do I get a nomination (award) for Wikipedia? Thank you. Happy editing! WIKI sir captain 2008 (talk) 11:16, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're referring to. Sorry. ―Panamitsu (talk) 20:49, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See: Does Wikipedia give stars to any work (article, edit) for example?. This is available on the All contributors page. Thank you. Happy editing! WIKI sir captain 2008 (talk) 07:37, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When you make a 'did you know' or 'in the news' nomination that gets onto the main page you get a credit for it. Same with when you get an article to 'good article' or 'featured article' status. There are 'barnstars' that are awarded by Wikipedians to other Wikipedians, but they're just for fun and are not some sort of formal recognition of an award. Some people are formally recognised by being given the Wikimedian of the Year award.

The real reward of editing Wikipedia is personal fulfillment, not some award that is given by somebody. ―Panamitsu (talk) 08:13, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clear and accurate answer. I admire you, sir. Thank you. Happy editing! WIKI sir captain 2008 (talk) 09:57, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Edmonds (brand)

The article Edmonds (brand) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Edmonds (brand) for comments about the article, and Talk:Edmonds (brand)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 12:42, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Figleaf (linguistics)

The article Figleaf (linguistics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apparent neologism. Consists of two sources by closely-related authors, who are not experts in linguistics (both philosophers). I'm skeptical that there exist enough sources for a discussion that would satisfy WP:NPOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 03:58, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COI template

I'm not sure how the outing policy applies here but User:Pakoire has her real name listed on her profile. If you search for her name and the organisation in question you can discover what the COI is for yourself.

Mayhap I should instead open a post on WP:COI/N and ping Pakoire given this seems to extend to several articles and not just one. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:07, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well that makes sense. Next time could you please explain in an edit summary or something why you think the template should be added? See Template:COI which says:

Like the other neutrality-related tags, if you place this tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article. If you do not start a discussion, any editor will be justified in removing the tag without warning. Be careful not to violate the policy against WP:OUTING users who have not publicly self-disclosed their identities on the English Wikipedia.

With the benefit of hindsight I now understand that you may have avoided naming her because of your concerns about outing. But maybe it would be a good idea if you could have explained what makes you think the article is non-neutral?

Looking at her edits I see that they're mostly adding alumni, images and missing citations. In one edit she even made the wording a lot more neutral. I don't think there is a problem with the edits at all and she has made the article much better. I suggest that you take a look at the edits before adding this template. ―Panamitsu (talk) 07:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think I will just start a discussion at COI/N the issue extends to over a dozen articles. I didn't really have time to review the articles hence why I added the templates instead of dealing with it myself. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:36, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't have time to check the edits them maybe you shouldn't add the templates. What's happening is you're causing other people to have to spend time checking the edits. And other people are low on time too. I'm going to revert your additions of the COI templates so you can re-add them if you see fit once you have more time to review Pakoire's edits.

Take a read of WP:TAGGING which says that Adding tags for non-obvious problems without discussion on the talk page which explains where the problems are is arguably not helpful. It can be viewed as disruptive and is often derided as "drive-by tagging" when done by editors who are not involved in the article's development. However, it is not actually "drive-by tagging" so long as they explain the rationale for the tag on the talk page. ―Panamitsu (talk) 07:44, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pāuanui

Hi, thank you for your edit. You are correct that the name of the town Pāuanui is spelt differently depending on the website you visit. The reason for my belief that the correct spelling for the town is Pāuanui is due to the fact that the Thames-Coromandel Council uses this spelling. I have attached a link to where the Thames-Coromandel Council have spelt it this way. Thanks for your time, Thomas (Harbin Kiwi).

https://www.tcdc.govt.nz/Our-Council/About-our-Council/Our-Wards-Information/Tairua-Pauanui-South-Eastern-Ward Harbin Kiwi (talk) 08:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you could submit a request to rename that article. I had a look a few days ago and saw the town named both with and without a macron so I was unable to decide which is used more commonly. ―Panamitsu (talk) 08:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for GeoNet (New Zealand)

On 10 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article GeoNet (New Zealand), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Aucklanders have a reputation for making false earthquake reports on New Zealand's earthquake monitoring website GeoNet? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/GeoNet (New Zealand). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, GeoNet (New Zealand)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Panamitsu

Hello, Panamitsu. You have new messages at Panamitsu's talk page.
Message added 22:01, 10 December 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

―Panamitsu (talk) 22:01, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Panamitsu. Thank you for your work on Sludge content. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day ahead.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:03, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SunDawn I did not start this article. I created the page in 2023, then someone turned it into a redirect, then last month someone turned the redirect into a new article (none of text came from me). ―Panamitsu (talk) 04:10, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Post nominal letters

FYI: MOS:POSTNOM says "post-nominal letters may be included in the main body of the article, but not in the lead sentence of the article." This is a relatively recent change per Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography/2023 archive#Proposal: Moving post-nominals from lead sentences to article bodies, and I think it has been strengthened even more recently, so probably few editors are familiar with it.-Gadfium (talk) 04:35, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I had no idea. Thanks for telling me. ―Panamitsu (talk) 04:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A trout for you

See Alpine Fault zoomable map. ChaseKiwi (talk) 11:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hahahaha. I suppose the source doesn't mean a perfectly straight line? I'll leave that article alone anyway. ―Panamitsu (talk) 11:10, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fentanyl daycare incident

The article Fentanyl daycare incident has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:EVENT. Not shown to have lasting significance beyond routine news coverage of the incident and the federal criminal complaint/sentencing of connected people.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bridget (talk) 14:21, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow there seems to be a proposed deletion of Panamitsu's 2023 Wikipedia article creations backlog drive. ―Panamitsu (talk) 21:16, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed this in passing given our recent exchange. Can you consider improving that article. I have minor CoI due to my employment in another jurisdiction so should not do so, but have removed the deletion notice and given hints for improvement direction and the specific reason which is outside my CoI in article talk. I note 2018 Amesbury poisonings is not slated for removal despite poisoning of civilians by nerve agents developed for military purposes being known since 1995. ChaseKiwi (talk) 22:47, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the sentencing in 2024 but haven't bothered adding anything else because of my lack of interest in the article. ―Panamitsu (talk) 23:11, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok article might die, because I am only interested for reasons that raise CoI as I have specifically directed roles in my current jurisdiction for detecting, monitoring such deaths and warning health care professionals to be aware. ChaseKiwi (talk) 00:43, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2023 Bronx poisoning for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Bronx poisoning is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Bronx poisoning until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bridget (talk) 01:41, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GeoNet logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GeoNet logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:12, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Minecraft characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Minecraft characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Minecraft characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 01:01, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello Panamitsu, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025.
Happy editing,
Abishe (talk) 22:16, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 22:16, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas. ―Panamitsu (talk) 22:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Tea in New Zealand

Hello! Your submission of Tea in New Zealand at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 16:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Panamitsu!

Happy New Year!

Panamitsu,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Andykatib (talk) 11:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Andykatib (talk) 11:41, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2019 Timaru hailstorm

On 1 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2019 Timaru hailstorm, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that insurers paid out about NZ$171 million in damages caused by a 10-minute hailstorm in New Zealand? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2019 Timaru hailstorm. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2019 Timaru hailstorm), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paora

On 1 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paora, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that following public backlash over the mistreatment of Paora (pictured), Zoo Miami stated: "We have offended the nation of New Zealand"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paora. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Paora), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

– 🌻 Hilst (talk | contribs) 12:02, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 22,134 views (1,844.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

American English?

Why are you concerned about the purity of American English. We understand ourselves. Yours aye, Buaidh talk e-mail 19:34, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? I've been adding the tags so someone in the future can find non-US spellings and fix them. I've also done that with New Zealand English. ―Panamitsu (talk) 22:14, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because in the wiki search you can do something like 'HasTemplate:"Use American English" InSource:"programme"' and then you can correct the spelling errors. ―Panamitsu (talk) 22:22, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spellbound (New Zealand TV series) has been accepted

Spellbound (New Zealand TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

While the templates you're adding are correct, the summaries state that you're adding the "use New Zealand English" template. It's a bit startling. Acroterion (talk) 04:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Huh thanks for telling me.. I don't know how that happened! Fixed now. ―Panamitsu (talk) 04:02, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I must've either misclicked without noticing or AutoWikiBrowser has a bug because 2 minutes after this edit with the summary "American English", this edit for some reason switched to "New Zealand English". Not sure why. Thanks again for telling me. ―Panamitsu (talk) 04:07, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I've sometimes had edit summaries do funny things if I'm not paying close attention. Acroterion (talk) 04:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you're adding these templates to thousands of articles, I'd suggest making an AWB bot and getting it approved via WP:BRFA. It drastically reduces watchlist spam, and it saves you the hassle of clicking 'save' eleventy billion times. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:03, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think my current method would get approved as a bot because the list sometimes has non-US articles in it so I have to watch the article titles and short descriptions. You could use negative categories in the Petscan search but there's always an exception. For example the other day I reverted my addition of the "Use American English" template to a sculpture that is in the US but was made by a British sculptor. Should that article use American or British English (ignoring MOS:RETAIN)? I think people would have a problem with that at WP:BRFA.

P.S. Eleventy is my new favourite word. Thanks for enlighting me. ―Panamitsu (talk) 00:16, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eleventy is considerably less than umpty though. Acroterion (talk) 00:53, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose umpty is a good name, although I prefer BIG FOOT and Sasquatch. ―Panamitsu (talk) 01:15, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for James Mustapic

On 13 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article James Mustapic, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that for television, James Mustapic set his mother up on a date with David Seymour, who will soon be the New Zealand deputy prime minister? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James Mustapic. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, James Mustapic), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:03, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]