Jump to content

Talk:332d Expeditionary Operations Group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge

[edit]

Page merged with 332d Air Expeditionary Wing. Ndunruh (talk) 15:27, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Tuskegee Airmen?

[edit]

Should this be merged with Tuskegee Airmen? --Zegoma beach (talk) 13:27, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted factually inaccurate information

[edit]

Deleted outdated information regarding this unit's record. Recent research has shown that bombers were confirmed shot down while under the 332d's protection. The claim that the Tuskegee airmen shot down the first Me 262's of the war has also been shown to be quite dubious.--24.179.209.239 (talk) 13:36, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If the Me 262 record is dubious, produce the record that proves it. Some have said that The airmen may have lost twenty five bombers during WWII entirely. White units were losing more than that per mission. So far no research has been produced to counteract their record. So produce yours. 01/19/2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.90.231.149 (talk) 01:12, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this article entirely

[edit]

Move?

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: article moved by User:Bzuk ~~ GB fan ~~ 08:14, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


332d Fighter Group → 332nd Fighter Group — Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:27, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 332d Expeditionary Operations Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:17, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WWII losses

[edit]

The WWII section should include both the pilot and aircraft losses, which are documented in the related article on the Tuskegee Airmen under "Controversy over escort record."Starhistory22 (talk) 03:41, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution

[edit]

Text and references copied from 332nd Fighter Group to Mac Ross, See former article's history for a list of contributors. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:332d_Expeditionary_Operations_Group&oldid=1218660282"