Jump to content

Talk:Apache Flex

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[untitled]

[edit]

This needs to be updated to reflect the fact that it is now an Adobe product. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.83.74.114 (talk) 04:42, 19 June 2006‎ (UTC)[reply]

The "See also" list

[edit]

OK, I just "sanitized" the list a bit. I just felt it covered so many different technologies and even minor companies, and also missed the new Microsoft Silverlight platform that directly competes with Adobe Flex.

It was:

  • XUL
  • Thin client
  • XAML
  • Flash Player
  • OpenLaszlo
  • Nexaweb
  • MXML
  • Adobe Apollo
  • Morfik

It's now:

  • Adobe Apollo
  • Microsoft Silverlight
  • OpenLaszlo
  • Morfik

It actually started with me wishing to just add Silverlight to the list because it was relevant, and ended up with me trimming it to only cover stuff more directly related to Adobe Flex and not e.g. XAML that is only a detail that's used in Silverlight. Leaving this note up here because I understand it can maybe seen as a bit harsh, and it can of course still see improvements. I was unsure about leaving Morfik in, but it's at least a development environment. Some of the stuff in there was also frequently linked in the article, like Flash and MXML, so I really didn't see much of a reason to keep those. -- Northgrove 10:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flex Builder

[edit]

Flex Builder is based on Eclipse, an open source IDE. Why then isn't Flex Builder open source? Isn't Adobe obligated to providing source code for any improvements they make to Eclipse? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.67.35.214 (talk) 07:09, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flex Builder is not open source, but it is provided free for education. here Lightblade (talk) 03:14, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Adobe does, in fact, release their derived source code used in Flex Builder to the community. See the Adobe Tech Note, Flex Builder source code derived from Eclipse.
Why can't I download the complete source code for Flash Builder, so I can build my own copy of it? I thought this was required by open source licenses.173.58.96.84 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:48, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Flex is not without its detractors"

[edit]

"Although popular as a rich internet application development environment, Flex is not without its detractors. In February, 2009, analyst firm CMS Watch criticized the use of Flex for enterprise application user interfaces [1]."

This refers to a fluffy article. Perhaps this sentence can be removed from the Wikipedia page?

Agreed. None of "they, them" refers to Flex; rather, in general, rich clients, virtual machines, proprietary platforms, coupled MVC. The thesis -- "consistent, cross-browser compatibility... is hard and expensive. But why does that mean you the customer must give up simplicity and supportability?" -- answers itself! Era139 (talk) 08:58, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, is someone actually going to delete it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.14.24.197 (talk) 18:15, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the "proven" BlazeDS technologies

[edit]

Speaking of fluffy, "proven" sounds like one of those things a marketing person inserts. Does it really contribute anything here?

Bobdc (talk) 03:45, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adobe Flex Revertion

[edit]

Adobe Was Donated And Copy It To Apache, Thats All. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rolandhelper (talk • contribs) 13:30, 7 June 2012‎

The software was donated by Adobe to the Apache Foundation. It's not a fork or a mere "copy". Adobe have ceased development of Flex and have handed it over to the Apache Foundation project for future development. This was a non-trivial process.
Version 4.6 was the last version released by Adobe. Version 4.8 was released by Apache in July. That was the first release by Apache and is a "parity release" with version 4.6 (i.e. the two are identical). All future released will by by Apache.
See the presentation here for an overview:
Or the timeline here:
For trademark, etc. information see here:
--RA (talk) 21:22, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


fantastic 5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.239.107.2 (talk) 09:17, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Apache Flex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Apache Flex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:46, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Apache_Flex&oldid=1198846930"