Jump to content

Talk:Harriett Woods

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Harriett Woods. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:28, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Harriet Woods and Abortion

[edit]

ln 1982 while running for Senate from Missouri and campaigning across the state, Woods argued directly to voters and to the camera for abortion rights for women, and would have won had the DNC funded her campaign in time. They did not fund women’s campaigns at the time, claiming women could not win office, until Harriet successfully argued with the facts that whenever women ran, they won, and the probl was that women did not run, not that they did not win, and when they ran, they did not get DNC funding. She unabashedly demanded choice for women in 1982 and almost won, so it’s a stretch to say that we have to gingerly address that topic in 2022. 2601:643:8400:790:2041:A296:4A50:ED93 (talk) 20:50, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]