User:Bingodogg/sandbox
Moral self-awareness theory
[edit]Moral self-awareness theory, first originated by Lawrence Kohlberg, is the idea that individuals have the ability to recognize and reflect on their moral beliefs and behaviours. It is vital to understanding the concept of moral identity. [1]
This theory explains the various emotional and cognitive processes involved in self regulation in moral contexts. By promoting self awareness of ethical principles, individuals are pushed to self assess continuously thus enabling individuals to align their behaviours and actions with their moral beliefs and values. Therefore this theory serves as a base for social harmony and personal growth. Moral self awareness also plays a big role in addressing global challenges such as the development of different policies demonstrating the broader relevance of the theory in both personal and societal domains.[2]
Origins and Historical context
[edit]Moral awareness theory has roots in both psychology and philosophy. The theory stems from highly influential works on moral development by different theorists such as Jean Piaget and Lawrence Kohlberg who observed various ways individuals perceive right and wrong.[3] Piaget focused his work on the role of cognitive development in children’s moral reasoning and discovered that morality begins with early childhood interactions and evolves with different stages of reasoning. On the other hand Kohlberg highlights the evolution of ethical understanding throughout the different stages of development.
Carol Gilligan's Ethics of care has also had an influence on this theory offering a counterpoint to Kohlberg’s framework, by discussing the emotional dimensions of moral reasoning[4]. Her work focused on the relational aspects of morality highlighting care and compassion as vital ethical components. Recent works emphasize the different interactions between cognition and ethical studies [5][6]. These important foundational works created the base for integration of Moral self-awareness theory into psychology.
Conceptual framework
[edit]Self reflection
[edit]Self reflection is a cornerstone of moral self awareness and it involves analysing one's decisions and actions to determine whether they correspond to values and societal norms. Self reflection enables individuals to identify what is morally right and wrong aiding personal ethical growth. Techniques such as journaling and meditation are commonly used to enhance self reflection [5]. They push individuals to self examine emotions, discover biases and refine decision making in ethically challenging situations.[7]
Moral identity
[edit]Moral identity is the degree to which ethical values are important to an individual's sense of self. Ethical values consist of elements such as honesty, empathy, justice and they shape how one perceives themselves and how they interact with others. Strong moral identity leads to consistent ethical behaviour throughout various situations. However, weak moral identity can result in moral disengagement where individuals normalize unethical actions which damages social structure. [8]
Self regulation
[edit]Self regulation involves adjusting behaviour in different social contexts. It serves as a way of control and is vital for a healthy social life. This process is mainly driven by emotions such as pride and guilt which motivate individuals to have a more ethical behaviour. As an example, feelings of guilt encourage individuals to fix issues. This process of self regulation is essential for addressing moral dilemmas. [9]
Development of moral self awareness
[edit]Moral self awareness is influenced by family, education and social interactions in childhood. Parents highly contribute to a child's ethical behaviour and moral values, furthermore as children grow their understanding of morality become more sophisticated as they interact with various people and figures [4]. Parents who guide their children to consistent ethical behaviour through their actions and words give children a stronger moral foundation, while inconsistent guidance leads to conflict in moral beliefs later on. [10]
Additionally, adolescence is an important period for development as during this stage individuals are faced with more complex ethical situations and begin to form some sort of moral identity. Educational programs that have the objective of teaching empathy and different types of ethics further support this development. Role playing exercises and discussions serve as an effective method to initiate moral reflection.[11]
Throughout the rest of one's life, moral self awareness continues to evolve through different personal experiences and cultural contexts. Adults change and adapt their ethical beliefs based on significant life events or societal changes throughout time[5]. Exposure to various cultural values and experiences can deepen ethical understanding leading to healthy social refinements. [12][13]
Cognitive and emotional components
[edit]Moral self awareness leans on various cognitive processes such as critical thinking and understanding of principles like justice and rights. Thanks to these processes individuals are able to evaluate different scenarios and make ethically correct decisions as cognitive flexibility enables people to consider multiple perspectives. The understanding of morality in multiple contexts leads to social unity and connectivity. [14]
Emotions also highly contribute to moral self awareness as empathy allows individuals to understand feelings of others fostering a more understanding behaviour, benefits of empathy can be seen in long lasting bonds and relationships. Emotions like guilt and shame act as regulators encouraging self reflection. Shame for example can shy individuals away from repeating mistakes done in the past and also breeds growth. [15]
Applications and implications
[edit]Personal growth
[edit]- Moral self awareness helps moral personal development by encouraging individuals to evaluate themselves based on their behaviour and thoughts thus enhancing ethical understanding. This process strengthens self awareness and leads to a healthier social life as it provides individuals with a consistent base of ethical morals and values. In addition it also promotes resilience by enabling individuals to face ethical obstacles while staying true to one's initial values [5]. This awareness enhances empathy and relationships by reflecting on their actions and also considering their impact on others. Individuals with greater moral self awareness are more likely to engage in altruistic behaviour putting forward the well being of others while maintaining their own values. [16]
Workplace ethics
[edit]- In workplace environments, moral self awareness supports ethical leadership and decision making which is vital for keeping the workplace professional and fair. Organizations that are able to prioritize self awareness through training in these areas like ethics training have a more efficient workflow where employees are more likely to act with fairness, reduced conflicts and an overall higher satisfaction rate. Moreover moral self awareness reduces ethical blind spots where individuals fail to recognize the moral consequences of their actions. Harmful behaviours and dishonesty can lead to corruption in the workplace.[17]
Counselling
[edit]- Self awareness is also a valuable tool in counselling as it helps clients address moral injuries and redevelop or reinforce current values. This aids one's sense of self overall. Counsellors use techniques such as guided self reflection to help clients find clarity in their morals and values by questioning individuals on different ethical situations. [18]
Public policy
[edit]- Moral values can reinforce public policy and judicial issues by encouraging decision makers to consider different ethical implications of their actions and promoting fairness and justice in the legal framework thus gaining public validation and trust, judges who reflect on ethical beliefs tend to make more balanced decisions reducing unfair biases.[19] Incorporation of moral values into the development of policies as effective as it is equitable. Issues such as big pandemics such as COVID 19 demonstrate how important fair healthcare allocation and public trust is. [20]
Critiques and challenges
[edit]Moral self awareness theory faces several obstacles and critique. This theory still remains a highly under researched topic and there are several reasons :
- Accurately assessing moral self awareness remains challenging as morality is a subjective matter and changes from individual. Developing a standardized tool to measure moral awareness remains an ongoing issue. Morality is also shaped by various cultural norms leading to differences in how self awareness is understood and also how it is expressed.[21]
Therefore, personal and societal opinions can highly influence moral judgments which can cause a lack of ethical consistency. For instance some cultures prioritize group harmony whereas others focus on personal values, an individualistic perspective. Oftentimes moral judgment and action occur unconsciously and are influenced by biases that are hidden and not recognized by the individual. [22]
Future exploration
[edit]Future research on moral self-awareness may involve investigating different cultural contexts and how they influence and shape moral self awareness.[23] As social media is becoming more and more present in our world, there is a greater need to understand its role in shaping one's moral self reflection. Examination of ethical influences of online anonymity and the different impacts social media has on moral development could prove highly insightful as anonymity often enables individuals to act in ways that do not align with their usual moral standards, creating a separation of self perception. Lapidot-Lefler and Barak [24] illustrate that anonymity reduces empathy and accountability in digital interactions. Techniques like MRI’s could highlight brain regions involved in moral reasoning thus providing a more scientific understanding of moral awareness. However, deeper neuroscientific development would also be beneficial in understanding emotional and cognitive processes in moral contexts. Advancements in AI could open new possibilities to study moral self awareness by analysing datasets of digital moral behaviours. Programs can be designed to detect moral shifts following global crises such as COVID or ethical debates. This new field of AI is still yet to be fully uncovered. However, work on AI ethics provides a foundation for examining the effects of technology on our social world.[25]
Reference
[edit]- ^ Friedland, Julian; Cole, Benjamin M. (2019-03-01). "From Homo-economicus to Homo-virtus: A System-Theoretic Model for Raising Moral Self-Awareness". Journal of Business Ethics. 155 (1): 191–205. doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3494-6. ISSN 1573-0697.
- ^ Helion, Chelsea; Ochsner, Kevin N. (2018-10). "The role of emotion regulation in moral judgment". Neuroethics. 11 (3): 297–308. doi:10.1007/s12152-016-9261-z. ISSN 1874-5490. PMC 6223643. PMID 30416611.
{{cite journal}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ "Lawrence Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development and Theory". https://www.earlyyears.tv/. Retrieved 2024-12-13.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help)|website=
- ^ a b Muuss, R. E. (1988). "Carol Gilligan's theory of sex differences in the development of moral reasoning during adolescence". Adolescence. 23 (89): 229–243. ISSN 0001-8449. PMID 3381683.
- ^ a b c d MA, Courtney E. Ackerman (2020-04-01). "What Is Self-Awareness? (+5 Ways to Be More Self-Aware)". PositivePsychology.com. Retrieved 2024-12-13.
- ^ Greene, Joshua D. (2014). "Beyond Point-and-Shoot Morality: Why Cognitive (Neuro)Science Matters for Ethics". Ethics. 124 (4): 695–726. doi:10.1086/675875. ISSN 0014-1704.
- ^ Ruedy, Nicole E.; Schweitzer, Maurice E. (2010-09-01). "In the Moment: The Effect of Mindfulness on Ethical Decision Making". Journal of Business Ethics. 95 (1): 73–87. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0796-y. ISSN 1573-0697.
- ^ Xu, Xiaofeng; Li, Miaomiao; Kwan, Ho Kwong; Zhang, Xiaomeng (2024-09-01). "The antecedents of moral identity: A meta-analytic review". Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 41 (3): 1697–1728. doi:10.1007/s10490-023-09891-8. ISSN 1572-9958.
- ^ Storch, Julia; Wan, Jing; van Ittersum, Koert (2024-09-28). "Resolving Sequential Self-Control Dilemmas: The Role of Pride and Guilt". Emotion Review: 17540739241278610. doi:10.1177/17540739241278610. ISSN 1754-0739.
- ^ "How Parents Influence Early Moral Development". Greater Good. Retrieved 2024-12-13.
- ^ Grose-Fifer, Jillian (2017-01-01). "Using Role-Play to Enhance Critical Thinking about Ethics in Psychology". Publications and Research.
- ^ Herzog, Patricia Snell; Beadle, De Andre’ T.; Harris, Daniel E.; Hood, Tiffany E.; Venugopal, Sanjana (2016-04). "Moral and Cultural Awareness in Emerging Adulthood: Preparing for Multi-Faith Workplaces". Religions. 7 (4): 40. doi:10.3390/rel7040040. ISSN 2077-1444.
{{cite journal}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help)CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ Geary, David C.; Xu, Kate M. (2022-12-01). "Evolution of Self-Awareness and the Cultural Emergence of Academic and Non-academic Self-Concepts". Educational Psychology Review. 34 (4): 2323–2349. doi:10.1007/s10648-022-09669-2. ISSN 1573-336X. PMC 8934684. PMID 35340928.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) - ^ "Moral Cognition". Ethics Unwrapped. Retrieved 2024-12-13.
- ^ "Guilt, Shame and the Moral Big Bang | Psychology Today". www.psychologytoday.com. Retrieved 2024-12-13.
- ^ "Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) and N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 701-778). New York: Wiley". www.sciepub.com. Retrieved 2024-12-13.
- ^ lparsons (2024-04-18). "What is Ethical Leadership and Why is it Important?". Professional & Executive Development | Harvard DCE. Retrieved 2024-12-13.
- ^ William T. Branch, Jr; George, Maura (2017-04-01). "Reflection-Based Learning for Professional Ethical Formation". AMA Journal of Ethics. 19 (4): 349–356. doi:10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.4.medu1-1704. ISSN 2376-6980.
- ^ "Bias, Discrimination and Harassment: Rules for Judges and Lawyers". www.americanbar.org. Retrieved 2024-12-13.
- ^ White, Douglas B.; Lo, Bernard (2020-05-12). "A Framework for Rationing Ventilators and Critical Care Beds During the COVID-19 Pandemic". JAMA. 323 (18): 1773–1774. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.5046. ISSN 0098-7484.
- ^ "OSF". osf.io. doi:10.31234/osf.io/nhvz9. Retrieved 2024-12-13.
- ^ Greenwald, Anthony G.; Banaji, Mahzarin R. (1995). "Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes". Psychological Review. 102 (1): 4–27. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4. ISSN 1939-1471.
- ^ Rothbaum, Fred; Wang, Yan Z.; Cohen, Dov (2012), Trommsdorff, Gisela; Chen, Xinyin (eds.), "Cultural Differences in Self-Awareness in Adolescence Pathways to Spiritual Awareness", Values, Religion, and Culture in Adolescent Development, The Jacobs Foundation Series on Adolescence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 66–94, ISBN 978-1-107-01425-1, retrieved 2024-12-13
- ^ Lapidot-Lefler, Noam; Barak, Azy (2012-03). "Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online disinhibition". Computers in Human Behavior. 28 (2): 434–443. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.014.
{{cite journal}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ Pascual, Leo; Gallardo-Pujol, David; Rodrigues, Paulo (2013-09-12). "How does morality work in the brain? A functional and structural perspective of moral behavior". Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience. 7. doi:10.3389/fnint.2013.00065. ISSN 1662-5145.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)