Hello Catsmeat, I had been working on a biography for many months but it continued to get declined. The common reasons for the declination was that it needed to be written in a more encyclopedic tone. I finally gave up on the article. A few weeks ago I received an email (not a message on my talk page) from someone claiming to be a wikipedian editor with high privileges. She said that she could rewrite the biography in an encyclopedic tone and get it published (for a fee) and referred me to your userpage, claiming that it was her own. I just wanted to alert you because I know that this type of impersonation is happening with other legit editors as well. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.126.195.2 14:52, 20 March 2015
Yay! Apparently somebody thinks I'm worth impersonating. That sort-of made my day. But be aware I don't do this for money, I never contacted "69.126.195.2", the person who did is not me!
This user does not understand the American "English" "language" artificially created by Noah Webster in 1828 for no other reason than just to be "different" and bloody well doesn't want to.
This user feels she has been made invisible and no one cares or knows of what this user feels, knows or exists for, this user will kill anyone who ignores her again, if they have stopped and then start again; arr what the hell, I'll kill them any way, EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.
To a user whose page I came across by chance, thoroughly read and found quite cool; for tirelessly contributing to Wikipedia in a somewhat silent way since a long time and with a large number of high quality edits. Sincerely surprised at being the first, M.L.WattsAir Mail ✈ 18:43, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar
For writing the article on James Pratt and John Smith; an interesting and important topic. Keep up the great work :). Ironholds (talk) 16:40, 8 June 2013 (UTC)