User talk:Arsenikk
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
FLC review
[edit]I have nominated List of Braathens destinations for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.
Good article reassessment for Apollo Global Management
[edit]Apollo Global Management has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (trout me!) 11:12, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
List of World Heritage Sites in Africa
[edit]Has been nominated for Featured List removal. 48JCL public (talk) 16:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Bergen Commuter Rail for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bergen Commuter Rail until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.-- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 22:07, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of TCDD DH44100 for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TCDD DH44100 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Chidgk1 (talk) 18:36, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Big Four Bridge
[edit]Big Four Bridge has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 21:21, 20 October 2024 (UTC)