User talk:Gilad.maayan

Comment about when to use "Edit Summary" and when to use "Talk Page"

Hello - You asked a question on the Yom Kippur talk page, namely, "I'm not sure if this sort of thing belongs on Talk pages, please let me know if I need to sign/explain a small contribution like this one." I'm a new user myself, but here's what I have found that works. I always use the "Edit Summary" line, (I am "zealous" about this) and include as much as possible. When I can't fit a clear and complete explanation in the Edit Summary line, then I write the longer explanation in the Talk page. For example, I would have put a short explanation for adding the citation in the "Edit Summary" and bothered with putting anything on the talk page. (It was clear what you were doing.) However, the section you wrote about not using the Mishna for Halachah was perfect so far as I can tell. There are actually very few rules - a lot comes down to common sense, I think. You may want to read more of the extensive commentary and documentation on using Wikipedia to get a sense of the approach, if you already haven't done so. ... Nice edits, by the way. I look forward to seeing more of your contributions. Best wishes on joining Wikipedia. DonToto (talk) 14:03, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gilad.maayan/Xeround

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gilad.maayan/Xeround requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WWGB (talk) 13:25, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I mistakenly created the above draft page without the "User" namespace

The page was a draft with almost no content. I was planning to write the content, but that will take a while.. I've requested deletion and recreated the page under the user namespace, where I can work on it at my own pace. Gilad.maayan (talk) 05:58, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Gilad.maayan, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Gilad.maayan/Xeround.

See a log of files removed today here.
Shut off the bot here.
Report errors here.
If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Xeround logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Xeround logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:16, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Nomination of N2WS (Veeam) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article N2WS (Veeam) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N2WS (Veeam) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 19:58, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello Gilad.maayan. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to N2WS (Veeam), but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Gilad.maayan. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Gilad.maayan|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Dom from Paris (talk) 14:14, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I did disclose my COI - this text appears on my user page: "I am currently representing N2WS, NetApp, and additional hi-tech companies. I'm aware of Wikipedia's policies regarding Conflict of Interest and intend to abide by them fully."

As per WP:COIDISCLOSEPAY "Paid editors must also provide links on their Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where they advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services." this I believe you have forgotten to do. This declaration "and additional hi-tech companies" does not meet the disclosure requirements. You have directly edited this article in cotradiction with COI guidelines which say that a paid editor should not directly edit the article after it has been accepted at AFC and go through and edit request. --Dom from Paris (talk) 14:04, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not advertise paid wikipedia editing services on any website. This is my company URL: [1]. I am not a paid editor, I am a marketing consultant doing many activities for my clients, like an employee. I am not paid specifically to write or edit on Wikipedia and this is a tiny fraction of the work we do for our clients which includes writing 10,000s of words of original content on their websites per month. Gilad.maayan (talk) 21:14, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure that you do not advertise wikipedia editing as one of your activities on professional social media? Please read again WP:PAID. Please also redact or strike your comments concerning bias by from myself and another editor. If you do not I shall be forced to report this WP:PERSONAL ATTACK. Dom from Paris (talk) 18:46, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:N2WS logo to upload.png

The file File:N2WS logo to upload.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]