User talk:Maxeto0910

Hello, Maxeto0910 and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are interested in learning more about contributing, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Red Director (talk) 15:15, 4 April 2019 (UTC) re 80.43.81.130 (talk) 04:18, 18 March 2023 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

A Message For You!

Hello, I edited the article Neckermann on Wikipedia, according to the German Wikipedia "Deutsche Wikipedia" the company was founded on 1 April 1950. Please edit if there's any mistake, Thank you 2409:4073:2EB1:1BD0:F998:E8E6:693:A895 (talk) 06:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Opinions

Re this edit: You're welcome to your opinion. I prefer WP:VOLUNTEER, specifically WP:MESS. Happy editing Paradoctor (talk) 22:23, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

I mean yes, I'm happy for every Wikipedia editor who voluntarily is contributing to building up a good encyclopedia, including you. I also assume that your revert was in good faith, and I think your revert, viewed in isolation, was still better than doing nothing at all and simply ignoring the issue because it at least pointed out the sensible guideline. However, in this case, I think it would have been more constructive to either point this absence out on the talk page or directly add the name to his article because the effort would have been comparable to checking his article and then reverting the edit, at least in the case of merely taking to the talk page. Yes, maybe it might have taken a little bit more time and effort, but it would have been more constructive because a correct and notable information that needs a verification that is easy and quick to find is still closer to the truth than the complete absence of it. However, like you already wrote, that's only my opinion, and you did nothing wrong in terms of Wikipedia guidelines and your edit was objectively still better than doing nothing. Maxeto0910 (talk) 05:25, 16 December 2024 (UTC)