Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armenian Internet Traffic Exchange "ARMIX" Foundation
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:28, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Armenian Internet Traffic Exchange "ARMIX" Foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD contested with The information about ARMIX is posted in the list of IXP. Also the media coverage of ARMIX activities ican be provided per request. However, it is enough just to search it in google and many articles can be found on the issue Beyond the obvious problems with this, not every exchange will meet WP:ORG, and there is no need to create one for each one in the list. I would have redirected but the title is not a plausible search term and the article is too new to warrant it. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 16:23, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 16:56, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:38, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I'm not seeing significant coverage for this topic. NickCT (talk) 16:02, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008 (talk) 12:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.