Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big League Fantasy Camp
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Moth (band). Other articles left to editing discretion Spartaz Humbug! 21:42, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Big League Fantasy Camp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I don't think the article meets critera for notability, it's completely unsourced (and I can't find any sources in a search). The only "reference" is a link to where the album can be bought. Proposed deletion tag was removed without any comment or improvement to the article, so I'm bringing it here. Raven1977 (talk) 00:03, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 00:07, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- keep. There is one source in the article [1]. It isn't much, but it does seem to verify the fact that this is an album by a notable enough band. The fact that it was released in 1996 on a not very notable label might account for the lack of online sources. xschm (talk) 20:10, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It's a link to buy the CD, and basically proves that it exists, but nothing else; I'm not sure that qualifies as a reliable source. Besides, the notability criteria says, "Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting." This Wikipedia article has basically just that, plus when/where the cd was recorded. The CD is already mentioned in the Wikipedia article about the band, so I don't see the need for a separate article about the CD. Raven1977 (talk) 22:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I wouldn't be opposed to merge and redirect. But that's not the same as deleting, which I don't think is the right thing to do here. xschm (talk) 00:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It's a link to buy the CD, and basically proves that it exists, but nothing else; I'm not sure that qualifies as a reliable source. Besides, the notability criteria says, "Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting." This Wikipedia article has basically just that, plus when/where the cd was recorded. The CD is already mentioned in the Wikipedia article about the band, so I don't see the need for a separate article about the CD. Raven1977 (talk) 22:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, officially released album by a notable band. Lankiveil (speak to me) 00:30, 14 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Merge to Moth (band) and Like a Butterfly 'cept Different should be merged as well, the references are not sufficient and there is just not enough info available for it to warrant its own page. The DominatorTalkEdits 17:54, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, I missed Provisions, Fiction and Gear and Immune to Gravity. Drop Deaf seems to have an independent source. The DominatorTalkEdits 17:56, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't tag the other albums because at least they had reviews (in the infoboxes) which seemed to be referenced. But I agree there's not much info other than that. Raven1977 (talk) 18:18, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.