Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Horse Spitfire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:00, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Black Horse Spitfire

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable Spitfire: the first reference credits it with just one enemy aircraft and no famous pilots. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:17, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:42, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:42, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not seeing anything here that shows this particular aircraft is notable enough to sustain a stand-alone article. Info contained therein might be added to the Lloyd's Bank and Supermarine Spitfire articles. Mjroots (talk) 10:58, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - presentation aircraft are not that unusual and I dont see anything that makes this one noteworthy for a stand-alone article. MilborneOne (talk) 07:57, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:30, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as stand alone article; not notable enough and add info for a mention in the Supermarine Spitfire article. Kierzek (talk) 17:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.