Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos santiago
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete, per CSD G10, a purely negative, unsourced biography of a living person J.delanoygabsadds 17:16, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Carlos santiago (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article was prodded as a hoax, but no information was provided as to why this would be the case. I'm bringing it here instead to make sure this is truly a non-controversial deletion as prods are supposed to be Mgm|(talk) 13:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as failing WP:V with a serious BLP problem. I would have tagged this for G10 as a negative unsourced BLP, but if the nominator wants to take this through process, okay. • Gene93k (talk) 16:34, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, possible hoax. In any case, fails WP:V, WP:BIO and WP:BLP. Nsk92 (talk) 16:39, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Tagged as G10 (not by me). –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 16:56, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.