Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles John Duffy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to USS Duffy (DE-27). Consensus was to redirect. Will add the one appropriate sentence to the ship article. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Charles John Duffy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SOLDIER. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 00:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 00:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 00:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 00:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 00:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to USS Duffy (DE-27). Fails WP:SOLDIER (Ensign not awarded any major medal played an insignificant role in Naval Battle of Casablanca) and WP:GNG. No SIGCOV in multiple RS so not notable. Mztourist (talk) 03:10, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to USS Duffy (DE-27) as the ship's namesake. Doesn't pass GNG or SOLDIER. The nominator is again advised to please cite a policy-based reason for deletion when nominating an article; SOLDIER is a good rule of thumb but it is entirely possible for a military veteran to fail SOLDIER but pass GNG. Failing SOLDIER alone - which is what the nomiation statement, not the first described this way either, implies - is not a reason to delete. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:13, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to USS Duffy (DE-27). Advice given above by The Bushranger is endorsed. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:43, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete having one of a class of roughly 500 ships named after you is not a sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and Merge to USS Duffy (DE-27), it's more appropriate to have relevant information about a ship's namesake in the ship's article than a completely separate article. Best, GPL93 (talk) 02:35, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.