Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irfan Ajvazi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Irfan Ajvazi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

disputed draftify, no secondary sources, not able to make a case for notability. entirely promotional microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish•growths)} 21:01, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Visual arts, and Photography. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:21, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
delete preferably speedily - non-notable vanity spam, doesn't even warrant a discussion for the obvious nature of the article (promo and a complete and utter lack of notability.) GRINCHIDICAE🎄 22:57, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no secondary sources at all. No significant coverage. Elspea756 (talk) 02:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no good sources, exhibitions of his website are clearly photoshopped, how exhibition in Austria has the same interior as one in London? Hermann Heilner Giebenrath (talk) 10:00, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hahaha I didn’t even notice that! GRINCHIDICAE🎄 01:43, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly does not meet any notability guideline. Lack of secondary reliable sources and notable exhibitions.Antimargi (talk) 16:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Subject is not notable and the article is way out of compliance with Wikipedia formatting.--WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:38, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:31, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.