Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NXgen Designs
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:42, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- NXgen Designs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete - does not meet WP:CORP. Google search for the company name brings up 99 results, of which 37 are "unique". I can't find much about the game "Road to Ascension" either (even the article admits that there was not much reception). Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 01:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It is reasonable to assume game design companies to have an online presence. This one doesn't, not even under the old name and every half-notable games design company releases their games through a game aggregating site like Newgrounds -- not Myspace. Doesn't seem to have created any press or cult following. - Mgm|(talk) 10:52, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:20, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Not notable as no reliable sources cover the history, culture, ethics, and reception of this company. Based on this myspace page, I would say this is just a small startup that is unlikley to fulfill the notability criteria here at this time. Judging from the "~edited by Co. C.E.O Michael Navalta" in the current article, there is likely conflict-of-interest here as the employees might be editing to build a presence through Wikipedia (in other words, advertizing). Jappalang (talk) 01:35, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.