Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Carole Tyler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:09, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Carole Tyler

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not inherited. She associated with important people, but I don't see any particularly noteworthy achievement in her own right. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:17, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:22, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:22, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Carole Tyler is significant for being a notable lynchpin in the Bobby Baker call girl ring. She is mentioned in numerous books about JFK and his presidency. Among these include "Kennedy Must Be Killed" (2010), "Lyndon B. Johnson, the Kennedy Assassination, and the Transfer of Power", "Act of Treason" (2011), "Hearings, Vol.2", "Hearings 7&8", "Who's Who In the J.F.K. Assassination", 1993, Newsweek Volume 65, Time, Volumes 83-84. C'mon, this person's entry needs to be added to, but it is a noteworthy one, not someone who should be eliminated because of lack of importance!Robert (talk) 21:23, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~. A classic 1E, with notability claims relying primarily on inheritence. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 16:37, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:40, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Bobby Baker which covers her involvement in the scandal and death. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:18, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comment - This seems to be a trojan horse anti-Ted Kennedy attack page in intent.~~ Carrite (talk) 15:15, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This bio on Spartacus Educational references further coverage in Time, as well as very public and newsworthy taking of the 5th Amendment. There is a clique at the Reliable Sources noticeboard that despises Spartacus Educational, but I have found it to be generally accurate in the same way that Wikipedia is generally accurate and therefore a reliable source. Carrite (talk)

Although not visible in the Google Books summary, THIS LINK indicates that the book Who's Who in the JFK Assassination: An A-To-Z Encyclopedia, by Michael Bensom includes a full entry for "TYLER, NANCY CAROLE." Carrite (talk) 15:24, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly a newsworthy figure, evidenced by THIS WIRE SERVICE PHOTO for sale on ebay. Carrite (talk) 15:26, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clear evidence that "Carole Tyler's" taking the 5th Amendment was FRONT PAGE NEWS in 1964. Carrite (talk) 15:28, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Clearly a public figure of the early 1960s, BLP1E deals with LIVING people. This is a historic figure about whom there are multiple, independent published sources. The piece as it stands is horrible, but that's not grounds for deletion. Passes GNG easily, as a quick Google search should indicate to anyone. Carrite (talk) 15:34, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that I cited WP:1E, not WP:BLP1E. However the discussions found here have convinced me that she is indeed notable after all. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:22, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Carrite. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 21:52, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:HEY. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:22, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.