Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northsky Air

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 19:58, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Northsky Air

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Charter airline operating in the Philippines that exists, but does not appear to meet WP:ORG nor WP:GNG. Article creator claims that verification is all that is needed for an article on an airline, no matter how little coverage. I disagree. I was able to dig up some mentions of the airline like this and ~~this~~, but nothing insofar as significant coverage of this charter airline. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 05:29, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 05:36, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 05:36, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, fellow Wikipedians please be careful with the second link posted by User:I Jethrobot. On my computer, the webpage was blocked by BitDefender because some sort of malware was detected. What is more, the website cab.gov.ph, which is linked from the Wikipedia article, is considered to be a "malicious site" according to Web of Trust and malwarepatrol.net. Now, concerning Northsky Air, I also think this article should be deleted, because WP:CORP is not met. Being included in the List of air carriers banned in the European Union does not mean anything beyond the mere existence of the company (because any airline from the Philippines is on this list).--FoxyOrange (talk) 17:49, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh geez, my apologies everyone, and thanks for the catch Foxy. I haven't noticed anything unusual on my comptuer since accessing that link, ~~but I'll put into a note to WP:BLACKLIST about this~~ (actually, I can't do that because it's evidently only for spammy links). I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 17:54, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^*poke* 03:35, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - merely being blacklisted by the EU is nothing significant, nothing on G-news that would prove significant coverage, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 09:02, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not enough reliable coverage, no scheduled services (it's only a charter airline, and a small one at that). Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:01, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Nom and HMSSolent; being an airline does not automatically confer notability, and it isn't an airline anyway, but an air charter company. CSD Category A7 is tailor-made for this IMO, as the article itself doesn't make a credible claim of notability. YSSYguy (talk) 01:44, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.