Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VG sun cumbuco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:37, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

VG sun cumbuco

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Repeatedly rejected at WP:AFC for lack of notability, repeatedly created in mainspace. Time to decide once and for all whether this can stay or not. Article as it stands doesn't even make clear what it is about, and sources are promo pieces. Fram (talk) 14:54, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment if it's kept, it should be moved to VG Sun Cumbuco, the capitalisation used on the resort's website. Wikishovel (talk) 15:02, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete PROMO and entirely non-notable. I can only find listings either for sale or rent. Guinness records are non-notable and not acceptable for sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 15:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unfortunately, this topic does not seem notable. Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 13:42, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:35, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.