Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vocal hiccup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:45, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vocal hiccup

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references, has been tagged for over six years. Air ♠ Combat _What's^{up, dog?} 00:30, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no claim of notability. Nothing to suggest this vocal concept is a notable contribution to music. MLA (talk) 03:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I am actually finding some links but there's still nothing actually convincing for an independently improved and notable article. SwisterTwister talk 18:45, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.