Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willem Barnard
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:49, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Willem Barnard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't find evidence that he meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 20:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Photography, Environment, Aviation, and South Africa. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:23, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Just can't find adequate sourcing. Tone is pretty promotional too.
- Delete Does not pass WP:NBASIC and does not meet the bar for WP:ANYBIO or any other additional criteria of notability for people. I searched the web but did not find independent reliable sources. Parts of the article read like an advertisement and goes on at length to associate the subject with family members. I found this interview (which does not count toward notability). I removed a number of WP:REFSPAM sources and all other included sources really scraped the barrel; I removed all bar one. -Lopifalko (talk) 08:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: NN individual, fails all cited notability policies. UtherSRG (talk) 13:28, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.