Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 June 13

Catherine S. Snodgrass – Deletion endorsed -- RoySmith (talk) 03:01, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

please refer to notable major news articles: https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/5gk5kn/the-war-on-kids, http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/the-entrapment-of-jesse-snodgrass-20140226#ixzz39WkYACDf> SnodMJMO1234! (talk) 23:55, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

neither of those are about the subject, the first doesn't even list her name. --81.108.53.238 (talk) 07:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse per the IP. No case is made against the reasons for deletion. Wikipedia only covers subjects that are covered by others independent of the subject. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:51, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Endorse. Both articles are about the daughter: If she meets WP:NBIO, a draft could be created, but notability is not inherited. SnodMJMO1234!, your username looks like it implies that you are a friend, or may have another relationship, so if you intend to create such an article please note that according to our guidelines any possible conflict of interest should be disclosed. Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:54, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse - As mentioned by Alpha3031, both of the sources listed are about a family member, and notability is not inherited. There is no argument presented as to an error by the closer, and this is not a request to resubmit. Prepare an article on Jesse Snodgrass, maybe. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:11, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

List of ACM-W Celebrations – debate relisted by closing admin. Hut 8.5 17:35, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

Most did not justify their reasoning for deleting the page. One original vote to delete was changed to keep after updating the context to demonstrate significant notability. The decision to delete or keep is not simply a vote - a major decision by an impartial editor should clearly demonstrate support for the principles guiding Wikipedia. The list is noteworthy, is not a directory, and is significant. On a more general and critical topic: How are specific lists (out of our quarter of a million lists) selected for deletion review? Cypherquest (talk) 15:51, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Endorse This probably should have been a merge request instead of an AfD, but here we are. I don't see anything to suggest delete was an improper result for this AfD, I'm not even sure you could close it as no consensus. SportingFlyer T·C 16:37, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

File:Montmartre_pitchal.jpg – Early close per WP:DRVPURPOSE as there is no deletion or deletion discussion to review here. If the uploader wants to remove the file from Commons, they need to edit it there and add the SDG7 markup. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:31, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

not sure if photo in this file can be hosted on Commons under any valid license Seauton (talk) 14:43, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's not clear what you're requesting here. You uploaded the file. If you're saying you'd rather it live locally on en instead of on commons, you need to go to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Montmartre_pitchal.jpg, and click the "Nominate for deletion" link to get it deleted there. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:04, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.