Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 January 5
January 5
[edit]- File:Coat of Arms of Kevon Burnett PM Lesser.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CIN I&II (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Highly doubt that this is a CC file, might be PD for some reason but a source is needed. Can't seem to find any corresponding article where this can be used at. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:54, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, I'm the uploader, they should be deleted, I uploaded them a while ago and forgot that I had uploaded them, apologies. CIN I&II (talk) 02:23, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- File:Coat of Arms of Avery Prasatik.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CIN I&II (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Highly doubt that this is a CC file, might be PD for some reason but a source is needed. Can't seem to find any corresponding article where this can be used at. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:54, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, I'm the uploader, they should be deleted, I uploaded them a while ago and forgot that I had uploaded them, apologies. CIN I&II (talk) 02:23, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- File:Coat of arms of Arthur Lacey-Scott in Glenbrook No Supporters.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CIN I&II (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Highly doubt that this is a CC file, might be PD for some reason but a source is needed. Can't seem to find any corresponding article where this can be used at. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:55, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, I'm the uploader, they should be deleted, I uploaded them a while ago and forgot that I had uploaded them, apologies. CIN I&II (talk) 02:23, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- File:Coat of Arms of Kristopher Eastham.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CIN I&II (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Highly doubt that this is a CC file, might be PD for some reason but a source is needed. Can't seem to find any corresponding article where this can be used at. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:55, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, I'm the uploader, they should be deleted, I uploaded them a while ago and forgot that I had uploaded them, apologies. CIN I&II (talk) 02:23, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- File:Genesis76-82boxset.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by BoffoHijinx (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Since the visual design of box set in the article is not described in terms of reliable sources, the image in the infobox can only be used as a means of identification (WP:NFCC#8 / WP:NFCI). A two-dimensional image is sufficient for this purpose (WP:NFCC#3b). In addition, this three-dimensional object has two licenses: the object's license and the photographer's license. In this case, they are both non-free. It is possible to make a freer image by photographing the 3D object yourself; or turn it into a two-dimensional one. — Ирука13 17:43, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose The photograph of the box set is clearly done by the publisher that owns the copyright to the box set and cover art (as part of the promotional material to send out the box art), so there is not a separate copyright, so the FREER argument falls apart. Once you clear that, then the other arguments for delete fall apart - the 3d photograph will have the same copyright burden as the 2d cover. Masem (t) 23:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Even if this image is indeed made by the copyright holder, according to WP:NFC#UUI#16 we should not use it.
- From your answer I still don't understand why we need to use a 3D image of the box set and its contents if a 2D image of the front of the box is sufficient for identification. — Ирука13 18:35, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- File:Banking Closure in 1929 - New York City.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Utahecon6 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The source page does not actually say if it was published in 1929 or not, so it could still be copyrighted. Also, as the source is the BBC, the photo, if published, could have been published first in the UK, in which case it would at best be {{PD-US-1923-abroad}} instead of {{PD-US}}. Stefan2 (talk) 22:01, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- An IP changed {{PD-US}} to {{PD-US-1923-abroad}} but did not provide evidence that it was published before 1930. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)