[65318] JSON Assertion: Use correct number format

[andreaslind01]

Description

See https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65318

Motivation and Context

This PR fixes the issues with JSON Assertions mentioned here: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65318

How Has This Been Tested?

Tested with the example testplan provided in the issue.

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Checklist:

• My code follows the code style of this project.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 55.24%. Comparing base (b73f690) to head (c337824).
Report is 533 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...rg/apache/jmeter/assertions/JSONPathAssertion.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #723   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     55.24%   55.24%           
- Complexity    10386    10387    +1     
=========================================
  Files          1062     1062           
  Lines         65777    65777           
  Branches       7536     7536           
=========================================
+ Hits          36337    36339    +2     
+ Misses        26839    26838    -1     
+ Partials       2601     2600    -1     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...rg/apache/jmeter/assertions/JSONPathAssertion.java	78.57% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b73f690...c337824. Read the comment docs.

[FSchumacher]

This was created to address #5539, but the attached test case does not fail any more (tested on current branch). Is this PR still needed?

[andreaslind01]

This was created to address #5539, but the attached test case does not fail any more (tested on current branch). Is this PR still needed?

For me the attached test case still fails - please see #5539 (comment)

[FSchumacher]

PR has been merged.
Thanks for your PR and your insistence :)
Could you test the current trunk or next nightly?

[andreaslind01]

Thanks for merging the PR @FSchumacher.
I've tested it with the current nightly and it works like a charm :)