Fix godoc linting error by adding missing godoc

[rakyll]

Also simply the wording in some existing package godocs.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @rakyll, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily focuses on a comprehensive update to the project's godoc documentation. The main objective is to resolve godoc linting errors by ensuring all packages have appropriate documentation and by refining existing comments for improved clarity and conciseness. These changes contribute to better code maintainability and a more accessible understanding of the codebase for current and future developers.

Highlights

• Documentation Coverage: Added missing package-level godoc comments to several packages, including agent/remoteagent, util/instructionutil, and numerous example main packages, to address linting errors and improve documentation completeness.
• Documentation Clarity: Simplified and clarified the wording of existing godoc comments across various packages, such as agent/llmagent, cmd/adkgo, and several cmd/launcher sub-packages, enhancing readability and conciseness.
• Package Renaming: Renamed the gcs package to gcsartifact within the artifact/gcsartifact directory to provide a more descriptive and context-specific name for the Google Cloud Storage artifact service.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request does a great job of adding and improving godoc comments across the codebase, which resolves linting errors and enhances documentation. I've identified a few minor typos and areas for improvement in the comments, particularly concerning Go's package documentation conventions for main packages. Additionally, I found an instance of an ignored error in a new example file that should be addressed to follow best practices.

[rakyll]

PTAL