Skip to content

Conversation

@ejona86
Copy link
Member

@ejona86 ejona86 commented Mar 22, 2022

The previous code assumed that only gRPC would be using these methods.
But twice now Netty has made a change (generally relating to security)
that used a method for pseudo headers that previously wasn't supported.
Let's stop the whack-a-mole and just implement them all.

This restores compatibility with Netty 4.1.75.Final. Fixes #8981

CC @njhill
Alternative to #9001

Backport of #9004

The previous code assumed that only gRPC would be using these methods.
But twice now Netty has made a change (generally relating to security)
that used a method for pseudo headers that previously wasn't supported.
Let's stop the whack-a-mole and just implement them all.

This restores compatibility with Netty 4.1.75.Final. Fixes grpc#8981
@ejona86 ejona86 requested a review from sergiitk March 22, 2022 14:42
@ejona86 ejona86 merged commit 9536204 into grpc:v1.44.x Mar 23, 2022
@ejona86 ejona86 deleted the backport-netty-more-header-methods-1.44 branch March 23, 2022 21:43
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 22, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants