Skip to content

Added junit reporter #166

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
geek merged 2 commits into from
Aug 19, 2014
Merged

Added junit reporter #166

geek merged 2 commits into from
Aug 19, 2014

Conversation

@krisb
Copy link
Contributor

@krisb krisb commented Aug 19, 2014

closes #165

@krisb krisb changed the title added junit reporter. close #165 added junit reporter Aug 19, 2014
@geek geek changed the title added junit reporter Added junit reporter Aug 19, 2014
@geek
Copy link
Member

geek commented Aug 19, 2014

This looks good, thanks for the help.

geek added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2014
@geek
Merge pull request #166 from krisb/junit_reporter
aeb89e5 
Added junit reporter
@geek geek merged commit aeb89e5 into hapijs:master Aug 19, 2014
@geek geek added this to the 4.1.0 milestone Aug 19, 2014
@geek geek self-assigned this Aug 19, 2014
@geek
Copy link
Member

geek commented Aug 19, 2014

I am opening a new issue (#167), can you also add documentation for junit? @krisb

@krisb krisb deleted the junit_reporter branch August 19, 2014 19:16
@geek geek mentioned this pull request Aug 20, 2014
Closed
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jan 9, 2020

This thread has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Please open a new issue for related bugs or questions following the new issue template instructions.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 9, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

@geek geek

Labels

feature New functionality or improvement

Projects

None yet

Milestone

4.1.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Junit output

2 participants

@krisb @geek