Add fee_paid_msat to PaymentSuccessful event
#271
Conversation
tests/integration_tests_rust.rs
Outdated
|
|
||
| expect_event!(nodes[4], PaymentReceived); | ||
| expect_event!(nodes[0], PaymentSuccessful); | ||
| let payment_hash = match nodes[4].wait_next_event() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Rather than breaking the macros here, can we add expect_payment_received_event and expect_payment_successful_event macros?
src/event.rs
Outdated
| PaymentSuccessful { | ||
| /// The hash of the payment. | ||
| payment_hash: PaymentHash, | ||
| /// Paid fee in milli-satoshis. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's borrow a bit more verbose description from PaymentSent:
| /// Paid fee in milli-satoshis. | |
| /// The total fee which was spent at intermediate hops in this payment. |
The fee as returned from `PaymentSent` event generated by LDK and is saved in `PaymentSuccessful` event.
53f91ba to
e20557c
Compare
|
|
||
| pub(crate) use expect_channel_ready_event; | ||
|
|
||
| macro_rules! expect_payment_received_event { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@tnull I added the following macros following the pattern in the file. for some reason, the macros I added are marked as "unused" although they are used in the multihop test. what am i missing?
Also, should I split the commit for adding those two, or its ok to be in the same commit?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"unused_macros: unused macro definition: expect_payment_successful_event"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah, yeah, that's because the file is included individually in all integration tests but not all will use this. No worries, you can just leave it as is and I'll clean up in a follow-up.
Resolves the first part of #255 adding the paid fee to the
PaymentSuccessfulevent.