Skip to content

Conversation

@lazandrei19
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@PetrHeinz PetrHeinz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you 🙌

end
end

describe "#write to cloud" do
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cloud infra is tested should send a chunked request to the Logtail API, here's driver instead of cloud_driver

Suggested change
describe "#write to cloud" do
describe "#should send a chunked request to the Logtail API using default host" do

Comment on lines 13 to 14
source_token abcd1234
ingesting_host s1234.g1.betterstackdata.com
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@lazandrei19 if you're stubbing this anyway, let's use the production cluster (s1234.eu-nbg-2.betterstackdata.com)?

Gem::Specification.new do |s|
s.name = 'fluent-plugin-logtail'
s.version = '0.1.1'
s.version = '0.1.2'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems we already have 0.2.0 released - https://rubygems.org/gems/fluent-plugin-logtail/versions/0.2.0

Looks like the version wasn't bumped in 778fc64

Suggested change
s.version = '0.1.2'
s.version = '0.2.1'

Copy link
Member

@PetrHeinz PetrHeinz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@PetrHeinz PetrHeinz merged commit 8af763f into main Feb 17, 2025
10 checks passed
@PetrHeinz PetrHeinz deleted the andrei/t-4793-bug-clients-support-for-fluentd branch February 17, 2025 13:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants