Fix bogus out-of-date Javadoc comments #454
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
That was one I must have written on far too little coffee. Hardly any of it bore any connection to reality. Ah. In my defense, it had been more coherent once, but did not get updated with c9f6a20.
As PL/Java 1.6.x requires Java >= 9, it makes little sense for a lingering javadoc comment to say you need Java 1.6 for something.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Discovered one that had been rendered rather incoherent by a later change to the code, and another still referring to a Java 1.6 requirement from a PL/Java version that requires Java 9.