Skip to content

Conversation

@bluwy
Copy link
Member

@bluwy bluwy commented May 17, 2023

Description

The updateCjsSsrExternals function updates server._ssrExternals that's only used here:

if (config.legacy?.buildSsrCjsExternalHeuristics) {
if (
cjsShouldExternalizeForSSR(specifier, server._ssrExternals)
) {
return
}

Since that code only runs on config.legacy?.buildSsrCjsExternalHeuristics: true, we can also add the same guard for updateCjsSsrExternals

Additional context

cc @delucis who found this. It was logging the ... doesn't appear to be written in CJS ... warning unnecessarily.


What is the purpose of this pull request?

  • Bug fix
  • New Feature
  • Documentation update
  • Other

Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following

  • Read the Contributing Guidelines.
  • Read the Pull Request Guidelines and follow the PR Title Convention.
  • Check that there isn't already a PR that solves the problem the same way to avoid creating a duplicate.
  • Provide a description in this PR that addresses what the PR is solving, or reference the issue that it solves (e.g. fixes #123).
  • Ideally, include relevant tests that fail without this PR but pass with it.

@bluwy bluwy added p2-nice-to-have Not breaking anything but nice to have (priority) feat: ssr labels May 17, 2023
@bolt-new-by-stackblitz
Copy link

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

Copy link
Member

@patak-dev patak-dev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting we missed this one for so long

@patak-dev patak-dev merged commit 13fc345 into main May 17, 2023
@patak-dev patak-dev deleted the ssr-skip-ssr-external branch May 17, 2023 10:27
@ASISBusiness

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

feat: ssr p2-nice-to-have Not breaking anything but nice to have (priority)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants