Re: Metaphone integration into PHP3 - license issues

From: Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:50:55 +0000
Subject: Re: Metaphone integration into PHP3 - license issues
References: 1  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-7715@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
GPL code is not acceptable for PHP. The bc math stuff is an aberration
and should be split into its own package for PHP4.

The "written permission" clause is there because some people were
concerned about people just packaging up PHP and selling it. (This
was decided at about the time someone had done just that, thus adding
to the concerns). Otherwise the PHP License is nearly identical to the
Apache/BSD license. We've never denied permission to anybody. That
clause certainly isn't there so we can make money. The PHP License
exists because the GPL is viral, and we want people like the
Stronghold folks to be able to bundle PHP with their server.

Jim

"Thies C. Arntzen" wrote:
> 
> hi (see conversation on bottom),
> 
> i got all the metaphone stuff in "place" - but i think i cannot commit
> until we sort this license stuff out.
> 
> - what is our approach to plain-GPLed software?
> - should we have a configure-switch --enable-gpl (sounds funny)?
> - what do we do with windows builds?
> 
> metaphone is only ~250 lines of code so we could ignore it (not put it
> into php) or rewrite it.
> 
> i'm really sorry and i do not want to start a lengthly thread - but i
> think we're in a similar situation with the bcmath thingie (which is
> included in the win32 build - so the win32 is "strictly" GPL?)
> 
> dont get me wrong: i love to write software, and i would prefer not to
> think about this kind of issues, but obviously we have to!
> 
> so, what is our plan?
> 
> tc
> 
> PS:  actually i don't like the "requires written permission" bla bla stuff
> in the php-license too much - i've spend a good few hours/nights/weekends
> on php internal stuff, and nobody has to ask me (i couldn't care less)!
> 
> Thies C. Arntzen                 "One Big-Mac, Small Fries and a Coke!"
> Digital Collections             Phone +49 40 235350 Fax +49 40 23535180
> Hammerbrookstr. 93                              20097 Hamburg / Germany
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 14:52:16 -0400
> From: Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com>
> To: Thies C. Arntzen <thies@digicol.de>
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Metaphone integration into PHP3 (fwd)
> 
> On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 05:05:38PM +0200, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
> > hi, i've wrote the module that uses your Metaphone code.. works great.
> >
> > problem is now, that people using php3 can choose which license they want:
> >
> <snicker-snatch>
> >
> > and we don't want to include code in the "standard" distribution which
> > doesn't allow us in the future to do so.
> >
> > i've included the php3-license, please send me mail if you feel
> > comfortable with it - than i will go ahead and put the metaphone stuff
> > into the next php release.
> 
> No, I'm sorry but I don't like this license.  Particularly this part:
> 
> >   1. Commercial redistribution of larger works derived from, or
> >      works which bundle PHP, requires written permission from the
> >      PHP Development Team.  You may charge a fee for the physical
> >      act of transferring a copy, and must make it clear that the
> >      fee being charged is for the distribution, and not for the
> >      software itself.  You may, at your option, offer warranty
> >      protection in exchange for a fee.
> 
> What's the philosophy behind the PHP license?  Smells like shareware.
> 
> You should probably split your distribution into a core PHP'd
> distribution and a seperate GPL'd set of packages.  Or, if you're
> interested in making some $dough$ off of PHP, you could do something
> like what MySQL does: seperate licenses for Microsoft (shareware
> license) and non-Microsoft (free license) operating systems.  A
> "sheep tax".
> 
> But, like I said, I want to see the code get used, and I don't want
> licensing to get in the way.  That's kinda the point of free software.
> There's gotta be a way to resolve this.  Perhaps you could pick
> through the Artistic License (being looser than GPL) and see if it and
> the PHP license can live together?
> 
> --
> 
> Michael G Schwern                                           schwern@pobox.com
>                     http://www.pobox.com/~schwern
>      /(?:(?:(1)[.-]?)?\(?(\d{3})\)?[.-]?)?(\d{3})[.-]?(\d{4})(x\d+)?/i
> 
> --
> PHP Development Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help@lists.php.net
> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net



Thread (21 messages)

« previous php.dev (#7715) next »