0% found this document useful (0 votes)
68 views4 pages

Univariate ANOVA on Learning Methods

1) The study examined the effect of two learning methods (discovery learning vs direct learning) on algebra skills among 40 students. 2) Students who learned through discovery learning had a higher mean algebra skill score (77.35) than those who learned directly (63.80). 3) Statistical analysis found a significant effect of learning method on algebra skills, with discovery learning leading to significantly higher skills than direct learning.

Uploaded by

YuLi Wahyuni
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
68 views4 pages

Univariate ANOVA on Learning Methods

1) The study examined the effect of two learning methods (discovery learning vs direct learning) on algebra skills among 40 students. 2) Students who learned through discovery learning had a higher mean algebra skill score (77.35) than those who learned directly (63.80). 3) Statistical analysis found a significant effect of learning method on algebra skills, with discovery learning leading to significantly higher skills than direct learning.

Uploaded by

YuLi Wahyuni
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Out put

Univariate Analysis of Variance

Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label
Discovery

Metode_Belajar

N
20

Learning

Langsung

20

Descriptive Statistics
Dependent Variable: Keterampilan_Hitung_Operasi_Aljabar
Metode_Belajar

Mean

Std. Deviation

Discovery Learning

77,35

6,915

20

Langsung

63,80

11,683

20

Total

70,58

11,699

40

Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa


Dependent Variable:
Keterampilan_Hitung_Operasi_Aljabar
F

df1
,021

df2
1

Sig.
38

,887

Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance


of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Design: Intercept + Pengetahuan_Awal +
Metode_Belajar

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects


Dependent Variable: Keterampilan_Hitung_Operasi_Aljabar
Source

Type III Sum of

df

Mean Square

Sig.

Squares
3578,127a

1789,064

37,619

,000

Intercept

3783,857

3783,857

79,563

,000

Pengetahuan_Awal

1742,102

1742,102

36,631

,000

Metode_Belajar

1447,916

1447,916

30,445

,000

Corrected Model

Error

1759,648

37

Total

204571,000

40

5337,775

39

Corrected Total

47,558

a. R Squared = ,670 (Adjusted R Squared = ,653)

Parameter Estimates
Dependent Variable: Keterampilan_Hitung_Operasi_Aljabar
Parameter

Std. Error

Sig.

95% Confidence Interval


Lower Bound

Intercept

Upper Bound

36,449

4,775

7,634

,000

26,774

46,124

Pengetahuan_Awal

,535

,088

6,052

,000

,356

,714

[Metode_Belajar=1]

12,105

2,194

5,518

,000

7,660

16,550

[Metode_Belajar=2]

0a

a. This parameter is set to zero because it is redundant.

Custom Hypothesis Tests

Contrast Results (K Matrix)


Metode_Belajar Simple Contrasta

Dependent
Variable
Keterampilan_H
itung_Operasi_
Aljabar

Contrast Estimate

12,105

Hypothesized Value

Difference (Estimate - Hypothesized)


Level 1 vs. Level 2

Std. Error

12,105
2,194

Sig.

,000

95% Confidence Interval for

Lower Bound

7,660

Difference

Upper Bound

16,550

a. Reference category = 2

Test Results
Dependent Variable: Keterampilan_Hitung_Operasi_Aljabar

Source

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

Contrast

1447,916

1447,916

Error

1759,648

37

47,558

Sig.

30,445

,000

Metode_Belajar

Pairwise Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Keterampilan_Hitung_Operasi_Aljabar
(I) Metode_Belajar

(J) Metode_Belajar

Mean Difference

Std. Error

Sig.b

95% Confidence Interval for


Differenceb

(I-J)

Lower Bound
Discovery Learning

Langsung

Langsung

Discovery Learning

12,105*

2,194

,000

7,660

16,550

-12,105*

2,194

,000

-16,550

-7,660

Based on estimated marginal means


*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
b. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Bonferroni.

Estimates
Dependent Variable: Keterampilan_Hitung_Operasi_Aljabar
Metode_Belajar

Mean

Std. Error

95% Confidence Interval


Lower Bound

Discovery Learning
Langsung

Upper Bound

76,627a

1,547

73,494

79,761

1,547

61,389

67,656

64,523

a. Covariates appearing in the model are evaluated at the following values:


Pengetahuan_Awal = 52,45.

Estimated Marginal Means

Univariate Tests
Dependent Variable: Keterampilan_Hitung_Operasi_Aljabar
Sum of Squares

df

Upper Bound

Mean Square

Contrast

1447,916

1447,916

Error

1759,648

37

47,558

F
30,445

Sig.
,000

The F tests the effect of Metode_Belajar. This test is based on the linearly
independent pairwise comparisons among the estimated marginal means.

You might also like