User talk:Martineden83

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Martineden83. Thank you for your work on 76th Locarno Film Festival. User:The Night Watch, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|The Night Watch}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

The Night Watch (talk) 05:44, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Martineden83. Thank you for your work on 80th Venice International Film Festival. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello! I want to inform you that I have checked your article and mark it as reviewed. Have a good day and thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TIFF

For future reference, please do not remove the hidden sections that are currently present in 2023 Toronto International Film Festival. Because various program line-ups are still pending for announcement in the next couple of weeks (e.g. Platform Prize dropped today), the sections need to be there in preparation for having films added to them once an annoucement is made — so they're hidden while they're empty, and will be unhidden when there's a list of films to add, but should not be removed from the article entirely given that they'll just need to be readded again sometime within the next 14 days. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 16:05, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures of Ghosts

Hi. I note that you used an external link to IMDb on this article, which is fine. However, you don't seem to be aware that there are specific templates for doing that, namely {{IMDb title}} and {{IMDb name}}. These are to be preferred to the way you did it, for reasons explained at WT:WikiProject Film/Archive 79#Masking imdb links as wikilinks: saving others like me having to clean up afterwards. Mike Turnbull (talk) 12:25, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 66th Venice International Film Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baarìa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.--Asqueladd (talk) 06:55, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vis-à-vis the hierarchy of subsections, the best standard a festival article could follow is the festival's standard. Don't try to shoehorn a purported harmonization (or "pattern") alien to such context. See also MOS:SEAOFBLUE to avoid linking unnecessary stuff as you repeateadly did in the introductory section of 71st San Sebastián International Film Festival.--Asqueladd (talk) 07:04, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to echo the complaints of @Asqueladd:. Your large-scale edits are superfluous at best and destructive at worst. Please do not try to transform every similar Wikipedia article to match your desired template (i.e. trying to create a pattern between every film festival page). Οἶδα (talk) 09:40, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding my Venice Film Festival editions, IF you look closely you will find out that i'm just correcting grammar errors, wrong titles, or broken wikilinks. Thank you for your concern, but that's definitely not the case Martineden83 (talk) 09:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Martineden83! Your additions to 2023 New York Film Festival have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:27, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

50th Telluride Film Festival

Please do not change the layout regarding the years of movies selected to screen at the festival, as it goes against the norm stablished in the previous Wikpedia articles regarding the past years of Telluride RuflesCando (talk) 21:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note on copying from sources

Hello Martineden83! Your additions to In water have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 20:37, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed that you removed a template that had tagged a revision for deletion, and that you had marked it as a minor edit. As the template instructions note, Please do not remove this template before an administrator has reviewed it.

Cheers!

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 21:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In Water moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to In Water. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:22, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: In Water has been accepted

In Water, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dcotos (talk) 06:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Martineden83. Thank you for your work on In Water. Dcotos, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add reception section.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 06:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Martineden83! Your additions to An Unfinished Film have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Broc (talk) 20:17, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chidananda S Naik

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chidananda S Naik. You are invited because you seem to have extensively edited articles and topics related to awards. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:48, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Damned (2024 Minervini film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BeTV.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Your recent editing history at Golden Osella shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Earthh (talk) 23:14, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of submissions for the Academy Award for Best Animated Feature for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of submissions for the Academy Award for Best Animated Feature, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of submissions for the Academy Award for Best Animated Feature until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sortable tables

Hey. Just curious why you're disabling all of these sortable tables all of a sudden? Not that I have any problem with it whatsoever, but it is a somewhat drastic change, because I'd wager a fair amount of people use it and { sort name } is ingrained into everything, so it's rather abrupt and w/o explanation in your edit summaries. They are rather useless, because people can just CTRL+F and count imo, but that's just me. I'd back you up if ever challenged for consensus, for what it's worth! --Cinemaniac86^Talk_Stalk 11:26, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't you just add them again? Why revert everything? Most of the Globes pages didn't had the sortable option, i was trying to update all of them Martineden83 (talk) 11:39, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Either one of us can revert back. The whole point was you're making abrupt, drastic changes without edit summaries. The Oscar pages, for example, are still all sortable, so it's pretty common practice. That's why I'm just suggesting at least explain your edits when you're doing that. --Cinemaniac86^Talk_Stalk 11:45, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Utah Wikipedia Day at Sundance Film Festival

Utah Wikipedia Day at Park City during Sundance Film Festival

Sat., Feb. 1, 11:00am–4:00pm MT, The Shop, 1167 Woodside Avenue, Park City, UT 84060

We invite you to celebrate Wikipedia's 24th birthday during Sundance. This is one of many Wikipedia Day celebrations. Join us either in person or remotely. Read more: →here←

Egyptian Theatre photo, Frank Schulenburg

21:30, 2 January 2025 (UTC) To unsubscribe from future messages from this list, please remove your name from this list.