User talk:Moonraker
 Archives |
|---|
| 1) 2009 – 2010 2) 2011 3) 2012 4) 2013 5) 2014 6) 2015 7) 2016 8) 2017 9) 2018 10) 2019 11) 2020 12) 2021 13) 2022 14) 2023 |
2024
[edit]
Like 2019, remember? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:49, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- I had forgotten, Gerda Arendt, but have looked back. A long way from home. Wishing you a Happy New Year! Moonraker (talk) 22:18, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! - On the Main page: the person who made the pictured festival possible --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- I had forgotten, Gerda Arendt, but have looked back. A long way from home. Wishing you a Happy New Year! Moonraker (talk) 22:18, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Conservatism
[edit]I think your recent edit was probably posted to the wrong discussion page.[1] TFD (talk) 04:44, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- TFD, you might like to look back at what was said by Dimadick. Moonraker (talk) 04:53, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry. TFD (talk) 05:44, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Dorothy L. Sayers
[edit]Hi Moonraker, thanks for thanking me for my edit on the Dorothy L. Sayers page. Unfortunately, it was reverted because another editor believes that "US is fine and understandable by all" which I happen to disagree with, and so does wiki MOS. Anyway, having been accused there of edit warring, I've decided to walk away and turn my attentions elsewhere. You do occasionally come across articles that are "policed" by very possessive editors who get extremely upset when someone else comes along and tries to make minor improvements on their territory. It's such a shame, but I always find it's best not to ruffle feathers. Ho-hum! Keep up the good work. 
Regards, Rodney Baggins (talk) 13:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- I saw that, Rodney Baggins, and you are right. But the pushiest ones usually have a chum backing them up. So looks as if they go around in pairs, like the police in Eastern Europe used to do. Sometimes, the answer is to take it to the talk page, but then the whole mob can turn up. So I spend most of my time here starting new pages and working on them, it can take the problem editors years to find them. Moonraker (talk) 16:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
What a lot of rather disgusting bad faith there is in display here. Baggins, your edits were partly poor and when those poor parts were reverted, you edit warred. The MOS is not prescriptive on the US/United States point, so some flexibility is acceptable (particularly in this specific case).
As to ‘a chum backing them up’, that’s another piece of nonsense. Tim riley and I both did the rewrite recently and we both took it through PR and FAC. To denigrate two colleagues working together in such a bad faith manner reflects more on your bad faith approach than on anyone else. - SchroCat (talk) 22:35, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Rather than slagging off other editors here, Moonraker, I suggest your time would be better employed in answering the question I asked you here. It would be a pity to have to revert what may be beneficial changes simply because you won't supply a reliable citation for your changes. Tim riley talk 08:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- For me boot is on other foot. Moonraker (talk) 16:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Just a note
[edit]Hi Moonraker, I've moved Ælfheah of Canterbury back to the original name, since the matter is clearly in dispute and was moved without formal discussion. You're going to need a RM if you wish to pursue further. Best – Aza24 (talk) 07:36, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
February music
[edit] | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
What about the march you mentioned on my talk? - I was on exciting vacation, see places if you are not afraid of peaks ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Afternoon, Gerda Arendt. That was Johann Heinrich Walch's funeral march, his best-known work, although it isn't always chalked up to his name. It must have a good story. Glad to see the spring is coming over there too! Moonraker (talk) 16:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks to Seiji Ozawa. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- The image, taken on a cemetery last year after the funeral of a distant but dear family member, commemorates today, with thanks for their achievements, four subjects mentioned on the Main page and Vami_IV, a friend here. Listen to music by Tchaikovsky (an article where one of the four is pictured), sung by today's subject (whose performance on stage I enjoyed two days ago). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- more music and flowers on Rossini's rare birthday --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:30, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
[edit]Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research
[edit]Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 25
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Isabel Greenberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Camden.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)