User talk:Search4Lancer

in.

The Way It Is

I value all feedback. No need to be afraid.
Discussions are archived whenever I get around to it. If you wish to revive an old topic of discussion, bring it up again here, but don't copy anything over to here from the archive. That'd be silly.
I will usually reply on your talk page. Anywhere else is just stupid.
I might edit your comments. Not what they say, but they may be edited for stupidity. Tough beans.
Be nice.
If you don't properly sign your message, I might not bother replying to it at all.

Please sign and date comments using 4 tildes (~~~~). If you do not, then there really wasn't much of any point in even leaving a message.

Archives: 1, 2

Sorry to bring up your signature again but...

...I've made it shorter! See my efforts here - same functionality, less code. Has to be a Good Thing, no? Regards, —Cel es tianpower ^háblame 21:31, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have made it even shorter (same page). It displays just as it does now - but will keep more people happy. I do hope you decide to use a shorter one. Ian¹³ /t 16:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sealand

Thanks for your work on Sealand. Since you say you are in touch with them, I thought you might know where I can get more details on Alexander Achenbach, Gernot Putz, and the Spanish Sealand crime ring.

Thanks!

Larry Estavan lawrencerestavan@rcn.com

64.121.73.85 07:13, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Rudolph

Eric Rudolph is no coward. If anything he is brave. The real coward are abortion doctors who murder for money. TripleH1976 11:11 a.m., 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi Search4, I urge you not to feed this troll. He has a long history of being a violent fundamentalist on Wikipedia. I originally tangled with him because of his edits to Jacob D. Robida, a neo-nazi that chopped up a gay bar with a hatchet. Of course in TripleH1976's eyes, that makes him a good christian that is now in heaven. The best response to this kind of guy is just to watch his edits closely. -Quasipalm 16:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

rock on.

Well, do you have any proof that those Myspace accounts were made by Adult Swim? It could have been easily made by some 13 year old fan of adult swim. Also, YouTube is famous for having fan created videos, and a "extended" version of a promo seemed kinda weird to me. We need accurate links, not fake ones. dposse 17:33, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip on the "Lebanon County, PA MSA"!

Thanks for the tip about my erroneous "Lebanon County, PA MSA" data. I've corrected it to "Lebanon, PA MSA".

Get The Picture Corporation

Yeeha, there's a new Sheriff in town, and he's toting the white-hot pistols of anti-commercialism. The new speedy deletion criterion about "advertising" falls pretty smack onto this article. I don't reckon that you intended it as such, and I think that the wording needs tightening up, but that's how it is these days. Perhaps a larger article on this whole industry? With a section about how popular lifting your gf's top right when the picture gets taken on the log ride?
brenneman ^{L} 06:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron... with all due respect, you haven't given me much of a chance to work on the article at all. I'm still in the middle of working on it. Give a guy a chance. Advertising? Hardly. Search 4 Lancer 06:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not due much respect! It's at User:Search4Lancer/Get The Picture Corporation now. It's a new thing, this anti-advertising purge, and the kinks aren't worked out yet. - brenneman ^{L} 06:23, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How about this... I'll continue working on it in my user space, and I'll show it to ya when I'm done... eh? I fail to see how an article on a company with several hundred employees across the country wouldn't make the cut, and like I said before, I'm nowhere near done with it. Search 4 Lancer 06:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me. - brenneman ^{L} 06:52, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Search4Lancer/GTP - eh? I might even be able to get company history information, if I can find that old newsletter... Or if I can get somebody to dig one out for me. Not counting on it, though. Search 4 Lancer 07:12, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've even omitted the words "high quality" - not because of policy, but because it was a lie - some of the pictures just plain suck (don't tell my managers I said that!). Search 4 Lancer 07:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... playing devil's advocate, there are quite a few around who are interpreting the new guideline far more braodly than me, and I reckon this would still get the chop. Check the logs to see what's getting a G11. Mentions in secondary sources is the cracker on these. But I'm guessing it would be hard to find in this case. I'll dig a little to see what I can find. - brenneman ^{L} 07:20, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The spelling of magic in the Wicca article

Hi, Search4Lancer. While I agree that many Wiccans do spell Magic with the final "K" to distinguish it from stage magic, this is not a majority practice, and is quite rare among the non-Wiccan Witches I have met. Now, your mileage may vary, and you may know Wiccans or Witches who spell it with the final k, but as it stands we've been using the more traditional spelling and avoiding the neologism. Thanks! Justin Eiler 17:24, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(removed) Justin Eiler 20:52, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

tribute in light

yeah... that was kinda stupid, huh? :) WookMuff 22:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:PCT-ATHS.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:PCT-ATHS.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You scare me!

You appear quite strange to me. I am scared. Waaaaaa! You might want to rethink that picture of you. It doesn't seem to reflect the best of you. No offence. Asteroidz R not planetz 14:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

You might want to think about having a different picture on your page. It doesn't look like one of your better pics.

Three Mile Island

Can I just ask why you removed the templates here, with no edit summary and marking it as minor? Thanks. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξ φ 19:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fairy nuff. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξ φ 12:14, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sphynx pics

Schuminweb,

The two Sphynx photos you uploaded, one of a kitten and another as an adult... are they the same cat? The colorations appear to be the same, so I'm thinking so, but just want to satisfy my curiosity (like a cat) and make sure.

Thanks, and please respond on my talk page (in addition to wherever else you wish)

Search 4 Lancer 06:22, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You know, I actually didn't take the photos myself. I just made a few edits to them and then re-uploaded them. You actually would want to contact User:Peter Mollard about that, since he's the one who originally contributed the images. I admit, though, when looking at them again, that spot does look the same, so it's not outside the realm of possibility. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:59, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not even just the large spot on the side, both of them also have a spot behind the right ear... if you can see what I'm talking about. Thanks anyway, though, I'll check with Peter. Search 4 Lancer 01:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:GTPcorp.gif

Hello, Search4Lancer. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:GTPcorp.gif) was found at the following location: User:Search4Lancer/Get The Picture Corporation. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:GTPcorp.gif

Hello, Search4Lancer. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:GTPcorp.gif) was found at the following location: User:Search4Lancer/GTP. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 06:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 16:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

vanport OR

Hi, I noticed your question on the talk page for Vanport_City,_Oregon regarding 15 or 16 deaths. I was on the talk page to add my own note regarding what I was told by a witness to the flood, who spent the night out there trying to help. He personally told me that he saw hundreds of bodies floating in the water, and that the media falsified the reports. He is now deceased so this question will probably remain unresolved forever.--Gar37bic (talk) 01:35, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

James Eric Davidson

Hi there. You contributed to this article way back in 2006; I have recently nominated it for deletion. If you're interested, your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Eric Davidson (2nd nomination). Robofish (talk) 23:59, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gemze

how do you know Gemse DeLappe? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.167.215.115 (talk) 22:08, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't. Why would you think I would? Search4Lancer (talk) 08:55, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited .hack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Virtual (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Attribution.

Hello, My name is Linze Lucas, a script writer and photo researcher with CGI Communications. Your image of the Pennsylvania College of Technology has been selected to be featured in a community video for RELOCATE.ORG about the town of Loyalsock, Pennsylvania in reference to the educational opportunities available around the town.

The copy right information below the photo instructed that you be informed of all uses of your image. You will be credited, along with the other photographers in the video credits. If you object to the use of your photo in this video, please let me know via email linze@cgicommunications.com .

Thank you for the use of a beautiful photograph.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PCT-ATHS.JPG

208.34.96.82 (talk) 17:45, 16 July 2012 (UTC)Linze Lucas[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Chino.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:24, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Cmo.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:56, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Coldspring pa.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:08, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:PCT-ATHS.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PCT-ATHS.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 18:41, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please claim your upload(s): File:Search4lancer.jpg

Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, amending the {{information}} added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add |claimed=yes to the {{media by uploader}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:31, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Search4lancer.jpg

The file File:Search4lancer.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Userpage photo for former user, conditions of use make it not free for Wikipedia purposes

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. B (talk) 15:06, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]