Wikidata:Property proposal/Gitee username

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Gitee username

[edit]

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic

   Done: Gitee username (P10884) (Talk and documentation)
Descriptionusername on a website publishing user generated content
RepresentsGitee (Q97173031) username (Q15901043)
Data typeExternal identifier
Domainhuman (Q5), organization (Q43229), project (Q170584), software (Q7397), technical standard (Q317623), event (Q1656682), programming language (Q9143)
Allowed valuesstring pattern (regex if possible)
Example 1Linux Foundation (Q858851)https://gitee.com/linuxfoundation
Example 2Tencent (Q860580)https://gitee.com/Tencent
Example 3WeBank (Q17500896)https://gitee.com/webank
Example 4OpenHarmony (Q102553047)https://gitee.com/openharmony
Sourcehttp://gitee.com/
Planned useimport 50 identifiers as a pilot for Wikidata:WikiProject Informatics
Number of IDs in sourceunsure, maybe 5 million as claimed by https://techcrunch.com/2020/08/21/china-is-building-its-github-alternative-gitee/ . Just guessing, maybe 1% of those merit import in Wikidata due to our already having related content about person, organization, software project, etc.
Expected completenessalways incomplete; I cannot foresee Wikidata ever wanting more than 10% of these identifiers
Formatter URLhttps://gitee.com/$1
See alsoGitHub username (P2037)

Motivation

[edit]

This identifier is useful for Wikidata:WikiProject Informatics and meta:WikiCite. It connects software developers, whether they are people, organizations, or groups, to the Gitee user account. One application of this is connecting mentions of software in academic papers to software developers who should get credit. Bluerasberry (talk) 17:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]